2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, Integration, and Ethnic Boundaries in Rural Guatemala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept implicitly suggests that isolated ethno-racial traits do not necessarily represent clearly defined social boundaries or bases of social cohesion, taking into consideration that they are embodied in different degrees by mixed-race individuals ( mestizos regardless of ethnic self-identification). In other words, this perspective partially relaxes the relevance of ethnic solidarity among individuals who embody different degrees of ethno-racial traits in contrast with views that underline the centrality of ethnic solidarity (e.g., see Pebley, Goldman, and Robles 2005). Accordingly, ethnic self-identification is presented as another ethno-racial characteristic rather than as a central indicator of a well-bounded ethnic group.…”
Section: Multidimensional Ethno-racial Status In Contexts Of Mestizajementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This concept implicitly suggests that isolated ethno-racial traits do not necessarily represent clearly defined social boundaries or bases of social cohesion, taking into consideration that they are embodied in different degrees by mixed-race individuals ( mestizos regardless of ethnic self-identification). In other words, this perspective partially relaxes the relevance of ethnic solidarity among individuals who embody different degrees of ethno-racial traits in contrast with views that underline the centrality of ethnic solidarity (e.g., see Pebley, Goldman, and Robles 2005). Accordingly, ethnic self-identification is presented as another ethno-racial characteristic rather than as a central indicator of a well-bounded ethnic group.…”
Section: Multidimensional Ethno-racial Status In Contexts Of Mestizajementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I included it in the first analysis and presented it in Table 2 in order to examine whether money whitens/ de-indianizes in Guatemala. In addition, I alternatively fitted these regression models with a control dummy variable for Evangelical respondents because of the possible influence of Evangelical religious beliefs on ethnic self-identification (see Pebley et al 2005), but its coefficient was statistically insignificant. Its exclusion did not alter the findings presented in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study elucidates ethnic differences in the importance and the type of father’s role, which is fulfilled by co-resident fathers of the same ethnicity , or which would have been fulfilled by absent fathers if they had had the same ethnicity as that of the mothers and co-resided with the children. On the other hand, because of the potentially higher instability of inter-ethnic unions, particularly in Guatemala where a rigid ethnic boundary/hierarchy that exists (Pebley et al 2005 ), the assumption that the absent fathers have the same ethnicity as the mothers may be less likely to be valid and the likelihood of paternity establishment and economic support payments may be affected by whether or not the nonresident fathers are of the same ethnicity as the mothers. Implications will be further discussed later.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately this differentiation by ethnicity incorporates the different development, economic, and fertility pathways present in the diverse populations. Related research examining health and fertility outcomes within Guatemala has highlighted the necessity of exploring the ethnic differences in determinants and correlates of these outcomes (Seiber & Bertrand 2002, Pebley, Goldman & Robles 2005, Lindstrom 2003, Lindstrom & Munoz-Franco 2005, De Broe & Hinde 2006. The gap in living standards and contraceptive use among these populations suggests that different factors may well be resulting in similar reproductive health outcomes.…”
Section: Direct and Indirect Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%