The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11259-008-9116-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, in vitro culture and characterization of foal umbilical cord stem cells at birth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms the mesenchymal nature of the cells investigated. Our results are in agreement with the studies conducted by a number of researchers (10,12). The fraction of mesenchymal stem cells with aneuploidy did not exceed the level of spontaneous chromosomal variability in equine peripheral blood lymphocytes (6,17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This confirms the mesenchymal nature of the cells investigated. Our results are in agreement with the studies conducted by a number of researchers (10,12). The fraction of mesenchymal stem cells with aneuploidy did not exceed the level of spontaneous chromosomal variability in equine peripheral blood lymphocytes (6,17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, their differentiative and proliferative potential has been reported to decrease with the age of the donor (Pittenger et al 1999). The possibility to collect a large amount of cells, in an inexpensive and noninvasive way, and without being risky for the donor is of a great concern for regenerative medicine and cellular therapy, especially if there is the chance to expand the cells in vitro and to cryogenically bank (Carlin et al 2006, Cremonesi et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, gestational tissues including umbilical cord blood (Kern et al 2006, Koch et al 2007, Guest 2008, Reed & Johnson 2008, Bartholomew et al 2009, Schuh et al 2009, Seo et al 2009, Raoufi et al 2011, umbilical cord tissues (Mitchell et al 2003, Carlin et al 2006, Hoynowski et al 2007, Cremonesi et al 2008, Passeri et al 2009, Lovati et al 2011, Iacono et al 2012a, amniotic tissues (Filioli Uranio et al 2011, Iacono et al 2012a, 2012b, Lange-Consiglio et al 2012, and amniotic fluid (AF) (Chen et al 2011, Dev et al 2011, Lovati et al 2011, Iacono et al 2012a) have been recently suggested, also in veterinary medicine, as appealing candidates for the derivation of MSCs to use in cell biotechnology. The human lesson teaches that presumptive adult stem cells derived from gestational tissues retain highest proliferation capacity, longest telomere length, broadest differentiation, and extensive proliferative potential when compared with cells obtained from adult tissues (Kogler et al 2004, Kern et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, primitive MSCs have also been isolated from equine UCM [9][10][11][12]. Specific pluripotent and MSCmarkers of equine and swine UCM are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their primitive embryonic stem-cell-like characteristics, UCM-derived cells, when exposed to specific stimuli, have the ability to differentiate into multiple germ layers including mesoderm in horses [9,10,13] and ectoderm in pigs [8,14] and horses [9,11]. Others: SOX2+ [9][10][11][12] Swine Embryonic cell markers: OCT-3/4+ Others: SOX2+, NANOG+ [8] As in human medicine (for review see [7,15,16]), also in veterinary medicine an important property to evaluate stem cells is to assess their usefulness in allogenic regenerative medicine. To test the immunological properties of UCM-derived cells, Carrade et al, (2010) studied healthy horses following a single intra-articular injection of autologous and allogeneic MSCs from equine UCM and found no significant differences between the degree and type of inflammation elicited by self and non-self-MSC [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%