1988
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.906-910.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and restriction endonuclease cleavage of Anaplasma marginale DNA in situ in agarose

Abstract: Bacterial restriction endonucleases were used to produce DNA cleavage patterns that could be useful as tools to study the relatedness among Anaplasma marginale isolates. Bovine erythrocytes infected with A. marginale were lysed, washed, and embedded in agarose. The embedded erythrocytes and bacterial pathogens were partially digested by sequential infiltration of the agarose with acetone, lysozyme, sodium dodecyl sulfate, and proteinase K. The unfragmented genomic DNA was left supported and protected in a poro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outer membrane proteins of A. marginale have been studied, and variants of the six major surface protein (MSP) genes ( msp 1 α , msp 1, msp 2, msp 3, msp 4 and msp 5) exist (Allred et al., 1990; Barbet and Allred, 1991; Visser et al., 1992; Oberle et al., 1993; Palmer et al., 1994, 2001; Alleman et al., 1997). Some studies have demonstrated genetic variation among different A. marginale strains by means of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (Krueger and Buening, 1988), Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic/Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (REP/ERIC) PCR patterns (Ferreira et al., 2001), PCR assay based on specific sequences of MSPs (de la Fuente et al., 2001; Lew et al., 2002) and protein sequence (de la Fuente et al., 2001, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outer membrane proteins of A. marginale have been studied, and variants of the six major surface protein (MSP) genes ( msp 1 α , msp 1, msp 2, msp 3, msp 4 and msp 5) exist (Allred et al., 1990; Barbet and Allred, 1991; Visser et al., 1992; Oberle et al., 1993; Palmer et al., 1994, 2001; Alleman et al., 1997). Some studies have demonstrated genetic variation among different A. marginale strains by means of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (Krueger and Buening, 1988), Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic/Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (REP/ERIC) PCR patterns (Ferreira et al., 2001), PCR assay based on specific sequences of MSPs (de la Fuente et al., 2001; Lew et al., 2002) and protein sequence (de la Fuente et al., 2001, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few studies about genetic relatedness among A. marginale isolates. The restriction endonuclease patterns produced from five different isolates (Florida, Louisiana, Oklahoma, St. Croix and Virginia) with the restriction enzymes Eco RI, Hin dIII, Bam HI, Sal I and Pst I, were not identical [25]. Restriction endonuclease patterns of Virginia, Florida and South Idaho strains by PFGE were similar, but not identical [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There are few studies about genetic relatedness among A. marginale isolates. The restriction endonuclease patterns produced from ¢ve di¡erent isolates (Florida, Louisiana, Oklahoma, St. Croix and Virginia) with the restriction enzymes EcoRI, HindIII, BamHI, SalI and PstI, were not identical [25]. Restriction endonuclease patterns of Virginia, Florida and South Idaho strains by PFGE were similar, but not identical [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%