2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762003000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and identification of mycobacteria from livestock specimens and milk obtained in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
54
2
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(11 reference statements)
5
54
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the report of Hermans et al (1990), no amplification was observed for M. avium, M. fortuitum, M. terrae, M. vacae, M. xenopi, M. flavescens, and M. scrofulaceum, which are non-MTC species commonly isolated from cattle in Brazil (PARDO et al, 2001;LEITE et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with the report of Hermans et al (1990), no amplification was observed for M. avium, M. fortuitum, M. terrae, M. vacae, M. xenopi, M. flavescens, and M. scrofulaceum, which are non-MTC species commonly isolated from cattle in Brazil (PARDO et al, 2001;LEITE et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In those animals, the occurrence of visible gross lesions in the mammary gland (MG) or supramammary lymph nodes (LN) is less than 0.5% (SERRANO-MORENO et al, 2008). M. bovis has been isolated from milk from storage tanks, inadequately pasteurized milk, and milk from tuberculin non-reacting cattle (PARDO et al, 2001;LEITE et al, 2003). This situation stresses the need for sensitive and accurate procedures for the rapid identification of the bacteria in milk, to assist in the control of this zoonosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a tuberculin testing survey conducted in 1998, an average of 7.1% of herds was infected, ranging from 2.8% in the Central West to 58.3% in the Northern regions. M. bovis has been isolated from livestock pathological specimens (bovine, buffalo and swine), and from raw milk, confirming the risk for humans ingesting raw or un-pasteurized milk, as well as under-cooked animal products (Leite et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The use of a single molecular technique can produce false negative results, hence the need for applying more than one type of technique. Leite et al (2003), using culture and identification by PCR and RFLP-PCR, found 68.2% of positivity for M. bovis in pathological bovine and bubaline samples. The efficiency of the culture used as a first criterion for M. bovis identification was low (23.6%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%