2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria in fruit processing residues from the Brazilian Cerrado and its probiotic potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P. acidilactici R9 and P. pentosaceus R10 also exhibited strong inhibitory abilities, with their inhibitory effects being more prominent against Gram-negative bacteria compared to Gram-positive bacteria. However, L. fermentum and L. paracasei displayed the weakest inhibitory abilities, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria, which is similar to the findings of Trindade et al (2022) and Younas et al (2022) . This is seemingly attributed to the ability of LAB in inhibiting or eradicating biofilms ( Shokri et al, 2018 ; Ibrahim et al, 2021 ), a mechanism that proves more challenging when confronted with the thicker peptidoglycan cell wall structure characteristic of Gram-positive bacteria.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…P. acidilactici R9 and P. pentosaceus R10 also exhibited strong inhibitory abilities, with their inhibitory effects being more prominent against Gram-negative bacteria compared to Gram-positive bacteria. However, L. fermentum and L. paracasei displayed the weakest inhibitory abilities, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria, which is similar to the findings of Trindade et al (2022) and Younas et al (2022) . This is seemingly attributed to the ability of LAB in inhibiting or eradicating biofilms ( Shokri et al, 2018 ; Ibrahim et al, 2021 ), a mechanism that proves more challenging when confronted with the thicker peptidoglycan cell wall structure characteristic of Gram-positive bacteria.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although probiotic isolates commonly come from dairy foods, more recently, probiotic products derived from sources other than milk products are being considered. This occurs in order to diversify the use of these microorganisms by population since dairy matrices have a limited level of consumption by individuals who are, for example, allergic to milk protein, lactose intolerant, or vegan [29]. Moreover, the autochthonous probiotics isolated from alternative food matrices possess inherent stability, contributing to improvements in the survival rate in food matrices; thus, the characterisation and identification of probiotics isolated from fruits and vegetables can provide resources for manufacturing products with higher stability and production efficiency [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the hemolytic activity and antibiotic resistance, another undesirable feature in acidophilic LAB is DNase activity [152]. For this reason, DNase activity should be considered in the safety assessment made before the acidophilic LAB are used [152,153]. In the study by Rodrigues et al (2021), in which they tested the safety of 93 isolates identified as LAB isolated from fruits, it was concluded that 14 isolates were not safe for use because they had DNase activity [20].…”
Section: Dnase Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Somashekaraiah et al (2019) found that none of the 75 LAB strains isolated from the traditional Indian fermented beverage Neera showed direct DNase activity [154]. Likewise, in three different studies evaluating the safety of LAB isolated from dairy systems [155], fruit processing residues [153], and fermented grain products [156], it was determined that none of these acidophilic LAB showed DNase activity. It was also reported that Levilactobacillus brevis and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei acidophilic bacteria isolated from goat milk do not show DNase activity [157].…”
Section: Dnase Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%