2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77359-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISOLA Code for Multiple-Point Source Modeling—Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated focal mechanisms through moment tensor inversion for the five strongest events (magnitudes between 4.5 and 5.3) using ISOLA software (Sokos and Zahradnik, 2008;Zahradník and Sokos, 2018) and the velocity model of Rigo et al (1996). We used stations from both CRLnet and the Hellenic Unified Seismological Network, at a maximum epicentral distance of 60 km.…”
Section: Seismological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated focal mechanisms through moment tensor inversion for the five strongest events (magnitudes between 4.5 and 5.3) using ISOLA software (Sokos and Zahradnik, 2008;Zahradník and Sokos, 2018) and the velocity model of Rigo et al (1996). We used stations from both CRLnet and the Hellenic Unified Seismological Network, at a maximum epicentral distance of 60 km.…”
Section: Seismological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better constrain and verify the initial focal mechanism solutions we also worked with ISOLA , which allowed us to estimate the moment tensor of two of the largest events (i.e., the M L > 4.0 occurring on 4 July 2018 at 1:50 and 19:45) (Sokos & Zahradnik, 2008, 2013; Zahradník & Sokos, 2018). We applied waveform inversion using both short‐period stations of the temporary network and the broadband stations from the INSN.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solved for the best point source moment tensor by minimizing misfits between observed and synthetic waveforms using an iterative deconvolution inversion (Kikuchi & Kanamori, 1991) implemented in the ISOLA software package (Sokos & Zahradník, 2008). The 15 robust solutions (listed in supporting information Table S3) each meet the variance reduction and other quality criteria defined by Zahradník and Sokos (2018); one is shown as an example in supporting information Figure S8.…”
Section: Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%