2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isodose mapping of terrestrial gamma radiation dose rate of Selangor state, Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya, Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Annual effective dose (AED) for the population was estimated using the conversion coefficient (0.7 Sv Gy −1 ) from absorbed dose in air to effective dose received by adults (Ramli, Sahrone, & Wagiran, 2005;UNSCEAR, 2000) and 0.2 a occupancy factor for outdoor. This was estimated using equation 1 (Sanusi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual effective dose (AED) for the population was estimated using the conversion coefficient (0.7 Sv Gy −1 ) from absorbed dose in air to effective dose received by adults (Ramli, Sahrone, & Wagiran, 2005;UNSCEAR, 2000) and 0.2 a occupancy factor for outdoor. This was estimated using equation 1 (Sanusi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher concentration of Pb in the Langat River is mostly from the natural weathering of Pb minerals along the granite rock belt of Titiwangsa Mountain Range. Several studies have also reported the weathering of Pb from the minerals such as Teallite (PbSnS2), Galena (PbS), Franckeite ((PbSn) 6FnSn2Sb2S14) are the important sources of Pb concentration in Langat [18,19]. Apart from the natural weathering process, the use of fertilizers such as arsenal herbicides (i.e.…”
Section: Dissolved Pb Concentration In Raw Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 241 in-situ measurements were made in the study areas covering a total of 20,259.2 km Calculated dose rates DC for the 29 samples were then compared to their respective insitu dose rate readings by linear regression to obtain a correction factor Cf to be applied to all in-situ measurements producing corrected dose rates Dm (Sanusi, 2014).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction factor Cf was then applied to the remaining 239 dose rate readings. Mean corrected dose rate reading Dm is 47 ± 1 nGy h Sanusi et al, 2014) . A prediction model of geological formation and soil types contribution to the dose rate readings was generated, producing the equation DG,S = 0.847DG + 0.637DS -22.313 with a normalized Beta coefficient equation of DG,S = 0.605DG + 0.395DS, translating to 60.5% contribution from geological background and 39.5% contribution from soil types to dose rates.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%