2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2005.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isobaric specific heat capacity of water and aqueous cesium chloride solutions for temperatures between 298K and 370K at p=0.1MPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainty of the temperature is estimated to be ( 1 K. Heat capacity measurements were measured with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-111, Setaram, France), which was calibrated in enthalpy (Joule effect) and temperature (CRMs, LGC, UK). 22,23 The melting temperatures of Hg, Ga, In, Sn, Pb, and Zn were used to calibrate the temperature indicated by the instrument and the heat of fusion of these metals was used to assess the calibration uncertainty due to the Joule effect. Table 2 shows the reference materials used, their origin and purity, as well as the recommended values for the enthalpies and temperatures of fusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of the temperature is estimated to be ( 1 K. Heat capacity measurements were measured with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-111, Setaram, France), which was calibrated in enthalpy (Joule effect) and temperature (CRMs, LGC, UK). 22,23 The melting temperatures of Hg, Ga, In, Sn, Pb, and Zn were used to calibrate the temperature indicated by the instrument and the heat of fusion of these metals was used to assess the calibration uncertainty due to the Joule effect. Table 2 shows the reference materials used, their origin and purity, as well as the recommended values for the enthalpies and temperatures of fusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the standard deviations of experimental and calibration data, the uncertainty of the thermal conductivity and temperature measurements were estimated to be ± 0.005 Wm -1 ·K -1 and ± 1 K, respectively. On the other hand, the heat capacity measurements were performed with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-111, Setaram, France) which was calibrated in enthalpy (Joule effect) and temperature following the procedure described by (Nieto de Castro et al, 2000;;Lourenço et al, 2006). This calorimeter is a heat-flux DSC which operates based on the TianCalvet principle and uses a cylinder type measuring system composed by two sintered alumina cylinder tubes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality checks of all alloys were performed by DSC, using a TG-DSC111 from Setaram, France, determining the melting/freezing zones (in heating and cooling). The DSC was calibrated in enthalpy and temperature, according to procedures described previously [16,17]. Figure 4 shows one of such thermograms, obtained for alloy VII, proving that there are no impurities melting outside the expected zone, and that no solid-state phase transitions were present, except for a small perturbation at 262 • C that can be identified in the phase diagram (Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%