2022
DOI: 10.31969/pusaka.v10i1.662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Islamic Centre Mu’adz Bin Jabal (ICM) sebagai Preferensi Keagamaan Masyarakat Urban

Abstract: Institusi pendidikan keagamaan modern berkontribusi besar dalam meningkatkan religiusitas bagi masyarakat, terutama pada masyarakat perkotaan. Tulisan ini mengkaji Islamic Centre Mu’adz bin Jabal (ICM) sebagai preferensi masyarakat kota Kendari sebagai lokus pendidikan religiusitas dan kesalehan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan sosiologi agama dengan pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik wawancara dan observasi. Hasil pengkajian yang dilakukan menemukan bahwa terdapat enam alasan bagi masyarakat kota Kenda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include ethnography of the religious aspirations of urban communities (Burchardt and Westendorp, 2018), religious architecture of urban communities (de Wildt et al, 2019), study on preferences for sharia housing (Sunesti and Putri, 2022), hijab as a model (Hassim, 2014), hijab among Muslimah workers (Abdelhadi, 2019), studies on preferences for digital literacy (Prihatini and Muhid, 2021), preferences for halal food (Junaidi, 2021), (Amalia, Sosianika and Suhartanto, 2020), (Ayyub, 2015) and (Baran, 2022), acceptance of halal products by urban communities (Manan et al, 2019), preference for halal cosmetics (Abd Rahman, Asrarhaghighi and Ab Rahman, 2015) (Hashim and Musa, 2014) and (Sutono, 2017). Dzulfikar, Santosa and Gunanto (2022) examined preferences in crowdfunding platforms; Khoiriyah (2020) investigated preferences for waqf; Khoiriyah, Paramita and Pangestu (2019) explored preferences for worker recruitment; Zainal and Samsulhadi (2022) examined preferences for educational institutions; and Cesur and Mocan (2018) and Hidayah (2021) examined choice and education preferences. Studies on financial institutions were conducted by Abduh, Ramjaun and Mustaqim (2018) and Iqbal, Nisha Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, Volume 23, No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include ethnography of the religious aspirations of urban communities (Burchardt and Westendorp, 2018), religious architecture of urban communities (de Wildt et al, 2019), study on preferences for sharia housing (Sunesti and Putri, 2022), hijab as a model (Hassim, 2014), hijab among Muslimah workers (Abdelhadi, 2019), studies on preferences for digital literacy (Prihatini and Muhid, 2021), preferences for halal food (Junaidi, 2021), (Amalia, Sosianika and Suhartanto, 2020), (Ayyub, 2015) and (Baran, 2022), acceptance of halal products by urban communities (Manan et al, 2019), preference for halal cosmetics (Abd Rahman, Asrarhaghighi and Ab Rahman, 2015) (Hashim and Musa, 2014) and (Sutono, 2017). Dzulfikar, Santosa and Gunanto (2022) examined preferences in crowdfunding platforms; Khoiriyah (2020) investigated preferences for waqf; Khoiriyah, Paramita and Pangestu (2019) explored preferences for worker recruitment; Zainal and Samsulhadi (2022) examined preferences for educational institutions; and Cesur and Mocan (2018) and Hidayah (2021) examined choice and education preferences. Studies on financial institutions were conducted by Abduh, Ramjaun and Mustaqim (2018) and Iqbal, Nisha Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, Volume 23, No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%