2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISeeU: Visually interpretable deep learning for mortality prediction inside the ICU

Abstract: To improve the performance of Intensive Care Units (ICUs), the field of biostatistics has developed scores which try to predict the likelihood of negative outcomes. These help evaluate the effectiveness of treatments and clinical practice, and also help to identify patients with unexpected outcomes. However, they have been shown by several studies to offer sub-optimal performance. Alternatively, Deep Learning offers state of the art capabilities in certain prediction tasks and research suggests deep neural net… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same concept had been used in [19] and [59], where only heart-rate signals were used and then aggregated during the first hour for mortality prediction. In [60], the authors built a deep learning model that used only on nursing notes to predict mortality.…”
Section: B Ml-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same concept had been used in [19] and [59], where only heart-rate signals were used and then aggregated during the first hour for mortality prediction. In [60], the authors built a deep learning model that used only on nursing notes to predict mortality.…”
Section: B Ml-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They achieved an AUC score of 85.5%. Caicedo-Torres et al proposed a deep learning model called ConvNet for mortality prediction [64]. Their system achieved 87.3% in terms of AUC, and they added further steps by using ConvNet in handling both static and dynamic data.…”
Section: B Ml-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davoodi et al [29] and Hoogendoorn et al [24] predicted after 24 h and within a median of 72 h, respectively. Studies by Tang et al [33], Caicedo-Torres et al [36], Sha et al [38], and Zhang et al [41] predicted in-hospital mortality irrespective of the admission or discharge time.…”
Section: Mortality Predictionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In traditional ML techniques, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Logistic Regression were the most commonly used algorithms. However, recent studies by Caicedo-Torres et al [36], Du et al [25], and Zahid et al [30] have used DL methods for mortality prediction with a promising accuracy ranging from 0.86-0.87 as reported in the Supplementary Table S1. Traditional ML models can be easily interpretable when compared to DL models that have many levels of features and hidden layers to predict outcomes.…”
Section: Mortality Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na abordagem populacionalé selecionado um conjunto de variáveis de todos os pacientes do RES para ser utilizado como entrada do modelo de ML com diferentes objetivos como a predição de mortalidade [Thorsen-Meyer et al 2020, Caicedo-Torres and Gutierrez 2019, Todd et al 2019. Em outros casos são utilizados dados de grupos de pacientes com características comuns como comorbidades [dos Santos et al 2020, Ershoff et al 2020, Lin et al 2019, gênero [Qi et al 2018, Mansoor et al 2017] e idade [Brajer et al 2020, Cooper et al 2018, van Loon et al 2017.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified