1961
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196143030-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ischiofemoral Arthrodesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1965
1965
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results differ in a number of respects from those of previous studies. The finding of Some degree of backache in all patients with arthrodesis of the hip is in direct contradiction to reports in previous series (Carnesale 1976, Vesely 1961, Watson-Jones 1938, Watson-Jones & Robinson 1956), but confirms a widely held clinical impression (Hordegen & Tonnis 1970, Stinchfield & Cavallaro 1950, Charnley 1951. There were also appreciable differences between our series and others in the incidence of symptoms arising in the contralateral hip (Carnesale 1976, Demigneux et al 1969, the ipsilateral knee (Carnesale 1976) and the contralateral knee (Stewart & Coker 1969).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results differ in a number of respects from those of previous studies. The finding of Some degree of backache in all patients with arthrodesis of the hip is in direct contradiction to reports in previous series (Carnesale 1976, Vesely 1961, Watson-Jones 1938, Watson-Jones & Robinson 1956), but confirms a widely held clinical impression (Hordegen & Tonnis 1970, Stinchfield & Cavallaro 1950, Charnley 1951. There were also appreciable differences between our series and others in the incidence of symptoms arising in the contralateral hip (Carnesale 1976, Demigneux et al 1969, the ipsilateral knee (Carnesale 1976) and the contralateral knee (Stewart & Coker 1969).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%