2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04214-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ischemic preconditioning and exercise performance: shedding light through smallest worthwhile change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data showed that PBMT did not influence the performance and physiological/perceptual indicators of the YYIR1 (i.e., HR, lactate concentration, and muscle oxygenation responses and RPE). Even considering the individual responses through SWC, which may be relevant in studies evaluating ergogenic aids [ 32 ] (i.e., not only mean group), our results show no differences between PBMT and placebo ( Figure 2 ). This is the first study testing the effects of PBMT on the YYIR1 performance in female futsal players.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Our data showed that PBMT did not influence the performance and physiological/perceptual indicators of the YYIR1 (i.e., HR, lactate concentration, and muscle oxygenation responses and RPE). Even considering the individual responses through SWC, which may be relevant in studies evaluating ergogenic aids [ 32 ] (i.e., not only mean group), our results show no differences between PBMT and placebo ( Figure 2 ). This is the first study testing the effects of PBMT on the YYIR1 performance in female futsal players.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Finally, each study which appeared to respect the criteria of eligibility was reviewed (figure 1). To estimate the quality of all articles included in this review, it was used a checklist (Table 1) based on our previous experience [12,30]. Two investigators analyzed the methodological quality of the articles assigning among 3 possible scores (Yes = 1 point, Unclear = 1/2 point, No = 0 points) for each item (total of 15) of the checklist.…”
Section: Study Selection and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for each item (n = 15), there were three possible scores (Yes = 1 point; Unclear = 0.5 points and No = 0 points) allowing measuring the general quality of each publication. As indicated in their systematic review and meta-analysis, our article got a score of 12.5 on a scale of 15 (Lalonde and Curnier 2015;Marocolo et al 2019) which is in the norm in regard to the other studies included in their analyses. In this sense, it appears that our original article got a score of 0 in question 6 ("does the study provide estimates of the random variability in the data for the main outcomes?")…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Dr. Marocolo et al recently published an article in the European Journal of Applied Physiology on the ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and exercise performance: shedding light through smallest worthwhile change (Marocolo et al 2019). We read with high interest their systematic review with meta-analysis to update the effects of ischemic preconditioning on exercise performance and physiological responses and we would like to congratulate them for their impressive work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation