Is Your Residency Program Ready for Generation Y?

Schlitzkus, Lisa L.; Schenarts, Kimberly D.; Schenarts, Paul J.

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.03.004

Cited by 90 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Au total, 68 articles ont été retenus, 31 concernant spé-cifiquement le domaine des études médicales [3][4][5][6][7]12, . Vingt et un étaient en lien avec les études en sciences infirmières [8][9][10]13,[15][16][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] , neuf avec différents domaines en santé [11,17,18,[59][60][61][62][63][64] et sept avec des domaines généraux pertinents comme le monde des affaires [1,2,14,[65][66][67][68] .…”

Section: Résultatsunclassified

“…Ils ont reçu un amour inconditionnel et des éloges constants, parfois démesurés, allant parfois jusqu'à l'abstention de critiques, même devant des comportements inappropriés [5] . Ils ont été impliqués dans de nombreuses activités parascolaires, où il n'y a eu que des gagnants (« trophy generation ») [3] . Ils ont été protégés des sentiments d'échecs.…”

Section: Particularitésunclassified

“…Ils ont énormément échangé avec leurs parents sur une grande variété de sujets [3] . Ils ont eu le droit de poser toutes les questions qui leur venaient à l'esprit.…”

Section: Particularitésunclassified

“…Ils ont des difficultés à prendre des décisions par euxmêmes et à gérer leurs propres agendas, notamment [6] . Ils ont appris à respecter les règles mais, assoiffés de guidage, ils sont exigeants, ont beaucoup d'attentes et posent beaucoup de questions [3] .…”

Section: Défisunclassified

“…Exposée à des expériences, des points de vue et des cultures extrêmement variés [1] et avec la plus grande conscience sociale [2] , c'est la prochaine « grande » génération, celle qui forge la dynamique de la décennie actuelle. [3,4] Hautement différente des générations précédentes, elle représente nos étudiants en médecine, nos résidents et nos jeunes professeurs [5] .…”

Section: Introduction Et Problématiqueunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Hautement différente : la génération Y, un défi de taille pour l’enseignement médical

Boulé¹

2012

Pédagogie Médicale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Résultatsunclassified

Section: Particularitésunclassified

“…Ils ont énormément échangé avec leurs parents sur une grande variété de sujets [3] . Ils ont eu le droit de poser toutes les questions qui leur venaient à l'esprit.…”

Section: Particularitésunclassified

Section: Défisunclassified

Section: Introduction Et Problématiqueunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Hautement différente : la génération Y, un défi de taille pour l’enseignement médical

Boulé¹

2012

Pédagogie Médicale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of Social Media Presence of Otolaryngology Residency Programs in the United States

Xie

Dedmon

O’Connell

et al. 2018

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IMPORTANCE Over two-thirds of the adult population in the United States use Facebook. Despite the high interest in and use of social media by the general public, the presence and accessibility of health care organizations on social media has not yet been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE To determine the use and popularity of social media among otolaryngology residency programs in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional study of the presence of accredited otolaryngology residency programs in the United States in an internet data repository was conducted. Programs were stratified by Doximity Residency Navigator reputation rankings (dividing programs into quartiles) and US News & World Report (comparing programs affiliated with hospitals ranked in the top 50 vs programs affiliated with unranked hospitals). Social media sites and activity for each program were assessed using internet searches. The study was conducted in April 2017. RESULTS Among 101 otolaryngology residency programs, 30 were found to have social media sites (29.7%). Facebook and Twitter were the most commonly used services, with 25 (24.8%) and 14 (13.9%) accounts, respectively. Based on Doximity Residency Navigator rankings, programs in the first quartile were more likely to have Facebook profiles than programs in the fourth quartile (42.3% vs 12.0%; absolute difference, 30%; 95% CI, 2.9% to 52.6%). Firstand second-quartile programs showed increased Facebook activity. There was greater Twitter presence in first-vs fourth-quartile programs (19.2% vs 8.0%; absolute difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, −11.6% to 33.0%). Higher-quartile programs were more active on Twitter and exhibited increased numbers of likes and followers. Analysis of US News & World Report rankings revealed that ranked programs had higher rates of presence, activity, and popularity on both Facebook and Twitter. However, these were smaller differences than seen when comparing Doximity Residency Navigator rankings. Correlation between the 2 ranking systems was indicated (Spearman ρ = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study suggests that otolaryngology residency programs with higher Doximity Residency Navigator reputation rankings have a stronger presence on social media. Smaller trends were observed for programs in the top 50 US News & World Report rankings. Overall, social media use among otolaryngology programs seems relatively low, and this may present an opportunity to increase communication with the public via these technologies.

show abstract

How do emergency medicine applicants evaluate residency programs in the post–COVID‐19 era?

Mackey

Feldman

Peng

et al. 2022

AEM Education and Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Pandemic disruptions to interviews and away rotations led applicants to rely on alternative sources of information about residency programs. We sought to compare program characteristics important to emergency medicine (EM)-bound applicants from before and after the pandemic. We also investigated the sources of information pandemic impacted applicants used during residency recruitment.Methods: This was a multi-institutional, cross-sectional survey of applicants to EM residency programs. We asked applicants about important factors in choosing a program and compared their response to results from 2019 National Residency Match Program. We also asked about alternative information sources used during this time of restricted access to programs of interest. Results:We surveyed 414 applicants from 40 medical schools and attained a response rate of 38.4%. Compared to 2019 applicants, our respondents identified morale of residents and quality of faculty as important factors in choosing a residency. Our subjects cited websites of the program and hospital affiliate, current residents, faculty/ mentor advice, Reddit, and Doximity as sources of program information.Conclusions: Compared to 2019, our EM-bound applicants who, because of the pandemic, were unable to visit programs of interest valued resident morale and faculty quality as factors in choosing a residency program. Without in-person visits, our subjects also had to use both virtual resources (e.g., websites) and traditional sources (e.g., mentor advice) to investigate a program's culture, reputation, and diversity and inclusion.Residency programs should monitor their online presence now that this has become an alternative source of information for applicants during curtailment of in-person visits.

show abstract

Is Your Residency Program Ready for Generation Y?

Cited by 90 publications

References 0 publications

Hautement différente : la génération Y, un défi de taille pour l’enseignement médical

Hautement différente : la génération Y, un défi de taille pour l’enseignement médical

Evaluation of Social Media Presence of Otolaryngology Residency Programs in the United States

How do emergency medicine applicants evaluate residency programs in the post–COVID‐19 era?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About