2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Vela Jr. a young supernova remnant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainty of this result is rather large, as can be seen when varying the properties of the explosion and of the SNR environment. A lower explosion energy closer to the canonical value of 10 51 erg or a higher density of the inter-cloud ISM delay the impact of the blast wave on the clouds significantly, and we would estimate a time of explosion about 2000 years earlier, consistent with the speculations by Katsuda et al (2009). Besides the geometry of the SNR, we can estimate the rate at which the X-ray bright front marking the interaction of the blast wave and the clouds expands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The uncertainty of this result is rather large, as can be seen when varying the properties of the explosion and of the SNR environment. A lower explosion energy closer to the canonical value of 10 51 erg or a higher density of the inter-cloud ISM delay the impact of the blast wave on the clouds significantly, and we would estimate a time of explosion about 2000 years earlier, consistent with the speculations by Katsuda et al (2009). Besides the geometry of the SNR, we can estimate the rate at which the X-ray bright front marking the interaction of the blast wave and the clouds expands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Age estimates for Vela Jr. range from ∼ 700 yrs (Iyudin et al 2005) up to a few 1000 yrs (Katsuda et al 2009). The question of the age of the SNR is closely linked to the determination of its distance, for which a similar range of values has been obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we could constrain the CXO J085201.4−461753 rotational energy loss from its spatial velocity and from the H α luminosity of the nebula (Chatterjee & Cordes 2002). We inferred the radial velocity V r from the assumed red-shift of the H α line, while we derived the transverse velocity V t from the CCO displacement from the SNR centre (≈5 ) which, for a distance of ∼1 kpc (Slane et al 2001) and for an age of ∼1000−3000 years (Katsuda et al 2009), implies a value of 500−1500 km s −1 . This corresponds to a spatial velocity V = 700−3000 km s −1 , large but not unheard of for a neutron star, as it is shown by the Guitar Nebula pulsar PSR B2224+65 (see, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ∼10 arcsecond-scale errors associated with the SNR radius and the differing coverage of the 1999 and 2011 observations (see Figure 1) make the data unsuitable for expansion rate studies, particularly because previous X-ray expansion rate measurements (Katsuda et al 2009;Allen et al 2015) suggest that sub-arcsecond yr −1 precision is required for this purpose. Dec.…”
Section: Parametrising the Snr Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 44 Ti detection was and remains controversial (Renaud et al 2006). More recent studies estimate ages of ∼1 to 3 kyr and 2.4 to 5.1 kyr (Katsuda et al 2009;Allen et al 2015, respectively), with distances of ∼700 pc (±200 pc). A new relevance for this object came to light when HESS observations at TeV energies (HESS J10852−463, Aharonian et al 2005Aharonian et al , 2007 H.E.S.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%