2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HST observations of the nebula around the central compact object in the Vela Jr. supernova remnant

Abstract: Context. A handful of young (a few thousand years) supernova remnants (SNRs) host point-like X-ray sources, dubbed central compact objects (CCOs), which are thought to be radio-silent isolated neutron stars formed by the supernova explosion. So far, no CCO has been firmly detected at other wavelengths. However, ground-based observation in the H α band detected a nebula around CXO J085201.4−461753, the CCO in the Vela Jr. SNR. The nebula has also been detected in deep R-band observations performed with the Very… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the Vela Jr. CCO features an optical nebulosity detected in the R band with the VLT and also detected in the H α line, which has been interpreted as either a bow-shock, produced by the neutron star motion in the ISM, or a photo-ionisation nebula (Mignani et al 2007b,d). However, new HST observations (Mignani et al 2009e) apparently contradict the latter scenario. For the CCO in RCW 103, often suspected to be in a binary system because of its transient X-ray emission and its 6 hours periodicity, a candidate counterpart was proposed (Pavlov et al 2004) For the RRATs, a search for bursting optical emission from J1819−1458 was carried out by Dhillon et al (2006) but with negative results.…”
Section: Central Compact Objects (Ccos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the Vela Jr. CCO features an optical nebulosity detected in the R band with the VLT and also detected in the H α line, which has been interpreted as either a bow-shock, produced by the neutron star motion in the ISM, or a photo-ionisation nebula (Mignani et al 2007b,d). However, new HST observations (Mignani et al 2009e) apparently contradict the latter scenario. For the CCO in RCW 103, often suspected to be in a binary system because of its transient X-ray emission and its 6 hours periodicity, a candidate counterpart was proposed (Pavlov et al 2004) For the RRATs, a search for bursting optical emission from J1819−1458 was carried out by Dhillon et al (2006) but with negative results.…”
Section: Central Compact Objects (Ccos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evidence of X-ray pulsations (Becker et al 2006) or of a known radio pulsar at this location. 3 The object does lie in or near a 6 arcsec-diameter optically-emitting nebula (Pellizzoni et al 2002;Mignani et al 2007), at least on the plane of the sky, but it is not clear that the detected optical (Hα or [NII]) source and the X-ray source are the same object (Mignani et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Hα band (Fig.2b) the nebula is more clearly resolved against Star Z than in the UKST image, with a clear maximum of emission at the centre of symmetry. This seems to indicate that the two objects are detached and, thus, that the nebula cannot be an unipolar gas outflow from Star Z (see also, Mignani et al 2009b). We qualitatively compared the Omegacam image of the nebula (May 11 2015) with the UKST (November 9 1999) Hα image of Pellizzoni et al (2002) to look for possible long-term variations in morphology and/or surface brightness associated with the displacement of the hypothetical bow-shock as CXO J085201.4−461753 moves in the ISM.The comparison is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Multi-band Imagingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the Omegacam observations provide the highest spatial resolution Hα images of the nebula and of the complex of bright arc-like structures observed 30 -40 West of CXO J085201.4−461753 ( Fig.2a) obtained so far. Indeed, the former is not detected in the HST images of Mignani et al (2009b) whereas the latter falls only marginally in the WFPC2 mosaiced image. These structures are seen through the NB 659 filter but not through the broad-band ones, 10 The nebula was indeed detected in the R band only thanks to the longer integration (5200 s) and the larger collecting area of the VLT (Mignani et al 2007).…”
Section: Multi-band Imagingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation