2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11832-009-0217-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is ultrasound screening for DDH in babies born breech sufficient?

Abstract: Purpose To review our incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in breech infants referred for ultrasound screening and to determine if subsequent follow-up radiographs are necessary in these patients with normal clinical and ultrasound examinations. Methods A review of the clinical data and imaging studies of all children with the risk factor of breech presentation that were referred for orthopedic evaluation over a 5-year period was conducted. All patients were examined by a fellowship-trained pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
2
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
73
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The left side is more commonly involved, perhaps due to the left occiput anterior positioning of most non-breech newborns where the hip is adducted against the mother's spine with limited space for abduction [1,5] . The breech position is probably the most important single risk factor, whether delivered vaginally or by cesarean section [6,16,17] . Other risk factors include first born children, postural deformities, oligohydramnios and a positive family history [1,18] .…”
Section: Incidence and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The left side is more commonly involved, perhaps due to the left occiput anterior positioning of most non-breech newborns where the hip is adducted against the mother's spine with limited space for abduction [1,5] . The breech position is probably the most important single risk factor, whether delivered vaginally or by cesarean section [6,16,17] . Other risk factors include first born children, postural deformities, oligohydramnios and a positive family history [1,18] .…”
Section: Incidence and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies raise doubt regarding the necessity of radiographic monitoring [165][166][167] , while others stress its significance [17,48,168] . The incidence of residual acetabular dysplasia after successful treatment with Pavlik harness cannot be disregarded [79,169,170] .…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sličnu preporuku za uspješnost liječenja dali su i u Dječijoj klinici Palo Auto u Americi: fizikalni pregled, UZV pregled obavezan do šeste nedjelje, radiografija na šest mjeseci, praćenje kukova i nakon normalnog UZV nalaza do isključenja displazije radiografski po Tonnisu [18].…”
Section: Metode Radaunclassified
“…If results are not conclusive, a follow-up at 2 weeks of age is recommended, follow-up being continued till walking is established 8 . If the results are still equivocal at 2 weeks, an ultrasound scan is warranted at 3 to 4 weeks of life or an orthopaedic referral 9 . Babies with risk factors such as breech delivery, too, must have imaging 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babies with risk factors such as breech delivery, too, must have imaging 10 . The AAP recommendation is ultrasound scan when the baby is 6 weeks old or x-ray when the baby is over 4 months old During infancy, ultrasonography is the diagnostic procedure of choice as x-rays are of limited value till the femoral heads start to ossify when the baby is 4 to 6 months old 9 . Ultrasound scans allow visualization of the cartilaginous part of the acetabulum and femoral head 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%