1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00310219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a ?sound window? for primate communication?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Kloss' gibbons typically live in a dense forest habitat, a narrow frequency range of their songs best adapted for longrange communication may have been se lected in order to broadcast them over long distances [Whitten, 1980], The occurrence of a 'sound window' in forest habitats has been demonstrated in several previous studies [summarized and reviewed by Waser and Brown, 1984], Therefore, because one main function of adult female songs appears to be for intergroup communication, a distinct and narrow frequency range with little variability must be maintained. Consequently, fre quency may be limited in selection for indi viduality in the Kloss' gibbon and therefore the durational aspects and number of notes per call may be the features manipulated, allowing for individuality in this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Kloss' gibbons typically live in a dense forest habitat, a narrow frequency range of their songs best adapted for longrange communication may have been se lected in order to broadcast them over long distances [Whitten, 1980], The occurrence of a 'sound window' in forest habitats has been demonstrated in several previous studies [summarized and reviewed by Waser and Brown, 1984], Therefore, because one main function of adult female songs appears to be for intergroup communication, a distinct and narrow frequency range with little variability must be maintained. Consequently, fre quency may be limited in selection for indi viduality in the Kloss' gibbon and therefore the durational aspects and number of notes per call may be the features manipulated, allowing for individuality in this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, birds have clearly been shown to adjust their acoustics to habitat [e.g., Brumm, 2004;Slabbekoorn & Smith, 2002]. The influence of forest habitat structure on the acoustical call structure of several nonhuman primate species has been reported [blue monkeys, gray-cheeked mangabeys, vervet monkeys, and yellow baboons: Brown et al, 1995;pygmy marmosets: de la Torre & Snowdon, 2002; Japanese macaques: Sugiura et al, 2006;Tanaka et al, 2006; blue monkeys: Waser & Brown, 1984, 1986. Although many studies have investigated the effects of forest habitat on the acoustic features of contact calls, little information is available on the effects of habitat on call rates or patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Spectral energy is concentrated at frequencies between 100 and 1000 Hz (Whitehead 1987). Attenuation in the upper forest strata is low in this frequency range, leading some to hypothesize that calls within this range are particularly well suited for longdistance communication (Wiley & Richards 1978;Richards & Wiley 1980;Waser & Brown 1984). Thus far, most functional explanations of primate long-distance calls have focused on their role in intraspecific communication (Byrne 1982;Kinzey & Robinson 1981;Sekulic 1982;Snowdon 1986;Tenaza 1989;Gautier & Gautier 1977;Waser 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%