2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Place for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Vulvar Neoplasms? A State of the Art Review

Abstract: Vulvar cancer (VC) is a rare neoplasm, usually arising in postmenopausal women, although human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated VC usually develop in younger women. Incidences of VCs are rising in many countries. Surgery is the cornerstone of early-stage VC management, whereas therapies for advanced VC are multimodal and not standardized, combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy to avoid exenterative surgery. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are scarce due to the rarity of the disease and prognosis has not i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, ICIs, such as pembrolizumab, have recently been included in NCCN guidelines as a recommended second-line option for PD-L1-positive advanced or recurrent/metastatic vulvar cancer [ 14 ]. Current opinion is that there might be a place for ICIs in vulvar cancer treatment, especially in combination with radiotherapy [ 55 ]. Results from the KEYNOTE-826 trial, recently published, show that the progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer with pembrolizumab than with placebo among patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer who were also receiving chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, ICIs, such as pembrolizumab, have recently been included in NCCN guidelines as a recommended second-line option for PD-L1-positive advanced or recurrent/metastatic vulvar cancer [ 14 ]. Current opinion is that there might be a place for ICIs in vulvar cancer treatment, especially in combination with radiotherapy [ 55 ]. Results from the KEYNOTE-826 trial, recently published, show that the progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer with pembrolizumab than with placebo among patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer who were also receiving chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our results seem to further support the use of ICIs in vulvar cancer treatment and, as reported in the KEYNOTE-826 trial for cervical cancer patients, the presence of PD-L1 expression could influence the response to treatment; in any case, this remains an hypothesis to be confirmed in specific clinical trials on VSCC patients. Regarding the correlation between PD-L1 expression and HPV status or prognosis, conflicting data are currently available in the literature [ 55 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. In our study, we observed no statistically significant correlations between PD-L1 and p16 IHC expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although germline mutations in mismatch repair genes, such as MLH1 and MSH2, which may be associated with microsatellite instability, were found in some EMPD patients, previous studies have reported that MSI-H status was not observed in most EMPD cases [86,87]. A review for immune checkpoint inhibitors in vulvar neoplasms including EMPD was recently reported [88].…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies of advanced EMPD cases treated with checkpoint inhibitors are needed to evaluate the efficacy. Currently, a clinical trial of nivolmab and ipilimumab for treatment of rare malignancies, including EMPD (NCT02834013), is ongoing [88].…”
Section: Immune Checkpoint Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regarding gynaecological tumors, the role of immunotherapy has so far been limited [ 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 ]. The efficacy of immunotherapy has been tested in ovarian cancer; however, the results were not as expected: the main phase III immunotherapy trials conducted in ovarian cancer yielded negative results [ 97 , 98 , 99 ].…”
Section: Pd-1/pd-l1mentioning
confidence: 99%