2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005gl024568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a causal relationship between cosmic noise absorption and PMSE?

Abstract: [1] We report on the first Southern Hemisphere comparison between polar mesosphere summer echoes (PMSE) and cosmic noise absorption (CNA). Observations were obtained during the austral summer of 2003 -2004 from a 55 MHz MST radar, a 38.2 MHz imaging riometer and a 30 MHz standard riometer all co-located at Davis, Antarctica (68.6°S). Case study PMSE events suggest that CNA plays a role in the intensification of established dayside PMSE possibly linked with soft electron precipitation from the polar cusp, and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar PMSE diurnal pattern variations were found by very high frequency (VHF) radar observations (Hoffmann et al 1999;Morris et al 2005;Latteck et al 2007;Nilsson et al 2008). Hosokawa et al (2005) observed similar diurnal results with Syowa and Iceland HF radar too.…”
Section: Diurnal Variationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Similar PMSE diurnal pattern variations were found by very high frequency (VHF) radar observations (Hoffmann et al 1999;Morris et al 2005;Latteck et al 2007;Nilsson et al 2008). Hosokawa et al (2005) observed similar diurnal results with Syowa and Iceland HF radar too.…”
Section: Diurnal Variationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…where θ s is the effective HPHW of the combined two-way polar diagram (Hocking, 1987 Morris et al (2005) that PMSE are influenced by electron precipitation, which is more prevalent in the auroral oval region compared with inner region. The above concept was recently verified by using a new 51.0 MHz VHF radar at Eureka (80 • N, 86 • W) in northern Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantitative comparison of the PMSE intensity between Davis and Andenes (69°N, magnetic latitude 66.5°N) has been made which suggests that PMSE at Davis are weaker [Latteck et al, 2007]. Like the Arctic PMSE observation sites, Davis is located well inside the auroral zone and can be affected by energetic particle precipitation at any time of the day [Morris et al, 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%