1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02605753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the rectum usually empty?—A quantitative study in subjects with and without diarrhea

Abstract: The authors have investigated the frequency with which the rectum contains feces by recording the presence or absence of fecal contamination of the membrane or of discoloration by feces of the contents of dialysis bags placed in the unprepared rectum for one hour. Feces were present in the rectum in 31 per cent of 32 studies in normal control subjects, in 49 per cent of 80 studies in obese subjects (P less than 0.05 from controls), in 36 per cent of 28 studies in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of a Japanese collaborative study are consistent with our findings (Wakai et al, 2007). The reasons may be that rectum is empty in most of the time, thus reducing the effect of fibre (McNeil et al, 1981) or because the fermentable rates of fibre and bacterial growth are highest in the colon (Mai et al, 2003). However, one study showed that insoluble fibre had a strong inverse relationship with rectal cancer (Slattery et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results of a Japanese collaborative study are consistent with our findings (Wakai et al, 2007). The reasons may be that rectum is empty in most of the time, thus reducing the effect of fibre (McNeil et al, 1981) or because the fermentable rates of fibre and bacterial growth are highest in the colon (Mai et al, 2003). However, one study showed that insoluble fibre had a strong inverse relationship with rectal cancer (Slattery et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…50 In addition, associations were primarily seen for colon cancer rather than rectal cancer, which is to some degree expected, as any beneficial effects of dietary fibers would presumably be reduced due to the short retention time in the rectum. 51 Results for distal and proximal colon cancer were generally similar, indicating an inverse association of total and cereal fiber intake on both subsites of colon cancer. Some differences were seen, but no clear pattern emerged from the subsite analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This could be due to the fact that there was less contact time of sennosides with the rectal mucosa, as colonic contents probably stay for a shorter period in the rectum than in the other areas of the colon even though the rectum contains more faecal material in patients receiving bowel preparation than in subjects without diarrhoea, in whom the rectum is mostly empty [25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%