2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the primordial crust of Mars magnetized?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed on the basis of the surface distribution of the magnetic anomalies that this magnetization event predated the formation of the Hellas and Argyre basins Lillis et al, 2013), roughly at the end of the Early Noachian (Head et al, 2001). However, the lack of an appreciable magnetization in two ancient areas on the highlands, the South Province and the Tempe Terra, further suggests that no strong dynamo existed in the first $100 My of Mars' history (Arkani-Hamed and Boutin, 2012). However, the lack of an appreciable magnetization in two ancient areas on the highlands, the South Province and the Tempe Terra, further suggests that no strong dynamo existed in the first $100 My of Mars' history (Arkani-Hamed and Boutin, 2012).…”
Section: Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been proposed on the basis of the surface distribution of the magnetic anomalies that this magnetization event predated the formation of the Hellas and Argyre basins Lillis et al, 2013), roughly at the end of the Early Noachian (Head et al, 2001). However, the lack of an appreciable magnetization in two ancient areas on the highlands, the South Province and the Tempe Terra, further suggests that no strong dynamo existed in the first $100 My of Mars' history (Arkani-Hamed and Boutin, 2012). However, the lack of an appreciable magnetization in two ancient areas on the highlands, the South Province and the Tempe Terra, further suggests that no strong dynamo existed in the first $100 My of Mars' history (Arkani-Hamed and Boutin, 2012).…”
Section: Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the Moon, the lunar magnetic field has been studied indirectly via the natural remanent magnetization of the returned lunar samples and directly with magnetometers carried to the surface and placed in orbit at low altitude above the surface on the Apollo 15 and Apollo 16 subsatellites (see reviews in Dyal et al, 1974;Fuller and Cisowski, 1987). Estimates have been made for the Moon (e.g., Garrick-Bethell et al, 2009;Shea et al, 2012;Tikoo et al, 2012) and Mars (e.g., Arkani-Hamed and Boutin, 2012;Lillis et al, 2008, Mitchell et al, 2007. In the case of Mars, Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) measured the magnetic field of the entire planet (Acuñ a et al, 1998).…”
Section: Magnetic Field Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been pointed out that the interpretation of the magnetization of volcanic features can be ambiguous [ Lillis et al , ] and the surface age might not be representative for the time of (de)magnetization [ Johnson and Phillips , ]. Also, the dynamo may have started before the primordial crust had formed and cooled [ Stevenson , ], or up to 100 Myr later, as there are large regions with no detectable fields over old terrains [ Arkani‐Hamed and Boutin , ]. Another unresolved question is the location of paleopoles, which contain information about the dynamics of the ancient core dynamo as well as true polar wander.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An asymmetric degree‐one convection pattern in the mantle could also be responsible for the formation of the topographic and magnetic dichotomy, either due to the concentration of melt production in one hemisphere [ Citron and Zhong , ] or due to thermal conditions leading to mineral phase transformations, e.g., the formation of serpentine [ Quesnel et al , ; Chassefière et al , ]. Also, a late start of the dynamo and subsequent localized magnetization by magmatic intrusions has been suggested [ Arkani‐Hamed and Boutin , ], which could have been locally favored by chemical alterations, caused by, e.g., elevated oxygen fugacity and the presence of water in the crust [ Hood et al , ]. Alternatively, the lowlands formation process could have erased any previous magnetization [ Arkani‐Hamed , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Martian mantle mineralogy shows a modest increase in Fe content when compared to the Earth (e.g., Ohtani and Kamaya ; Bertka and Fei ), and the viscosity may be reduced at a given stress by a factor of ~3–5 (Zhao et al. ). A further uncertainty is related to the activation volume, which can vary between 5 × 10 −6 and 20 × 10 −6 m 3 mol −1 (e.g., Karato and Wu ).…”
Section: Interaction Between Volatiles Partial Melting and Mantle Cmentioning
confidence: 99%