2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the parallel walk between competing male fallow deer, Dama dama, a lateral display of individual quality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest difference between the red and fallow deer appeared in the frequency of consequent use of vocalization and parallel walk (34% in red deer, 45% in fallow deer). Unlike red deer , we found that fallow deer would interrupt a fight and switch into another parallel walk [Jennings et al, 2003;Mattiangeli et al, 1998;McElligott et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The greatest difference between the red and fallow deer appeared in the frequency of consequent use of vocalization and parallel walk (34% in red deer, 45% in fallow deer). Unlike red deer , we found that fallow deer would interrupt a fight and switch into another parallel walk [Jennings et al, 2003;Mattiangeli et al, 1998;McElligott et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Consequently, any assessment of criteria that do not vary with changes in body condition during the rut can result in incorrect conclusions . That is possibly why Jennings et al [2002Jennings et al [ , 2003 did not find any relationship between the presentation of the antlers or body profile and fighting success. Instead, lateral presentation of the palmate antlers and/or body during the parallel walk seems to be an expression of avoiding a faceto-face look, or ''hard'' or ''direct look'', ''stare' ', etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2004). It has been established that winners and losers differ in the frequency with which they initiate lateral display during contests leading Jennings et al. (2002, 2003) to conclude that lateral display does not facilitate an assessment of opponent quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%