2016
DOI: 10.1515/mammalia-2014-0130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the knowledge of bat distribution in the Atlantic Rainforest sufficient? Comments about new findings and a case study in the Paraná State coastal area, Brazil

Abstract: This study aimed to utilize data of recent studies of bats surveying in the Atlantic Rainforest to evaluate the degree of knowledge of bat distribution in this biome. Data of new records or range extension of species published between 2010 and 2013 were compared among Brazilian biomes. We also utilized a case study in the Paraná State coastal area, southern Brazil, which was considered of low priority for bat inventories but had new records reported recently. The Atlantic Rainforest showed the highest number o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial and taxonomic bias found here is supported by new acoustic studies in Brazil (Hintze, Barbier, & Bernard, ) and reinforces the clear under sampled characteristic of the Brazilian bat fauna, with large knowledge gaps (Bernard et al, ). Therefore, besides some progresses (Barros et al, ; Dalponte, Gregorin, Esteves‐Costa, Rocha, & Marcelino, ; Miranda, Zago, Carvalho, Rubio, & Bernardi, ), our analysis still suggests that none of the Brazilian biomes can be considered well surveyed for bats (see also Varzinczak, Bernardi, & Passos, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The spatial and taxonomic bias found here is supported by new acoustic studies in Brazil (Hintze, Barbier, & Bernard, ) and reinforces the clear under sampled characteristic of the Brazilian bat fauna, with large knowledge gaps (Bernard et al, ). Therefore, besides some progresses (Barros et al, ; Dalponte, Gregorin, Esteves‐Costa, Rocha, & Marcelino, ; Miranda, Zago, Carvalho, Rubio, & Bernardi, ), our analysis still suggests that none of the Brazilian biomes can be considered well surveyed for bats (see also Varzinczak, Bernardi, & Passos, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…With this new record, the number of bat species known to Paraná has now increased to 70 (Bianconi et al 2009, Scultori et al 2009, Passos et al 2010, Moratelli et al 2011, Carvalho et al 2014. Although recently there has been an increase in the number of bat records in the Atlantic Forest of Paraná, a number of factors such as fewer long-term monitoring schemes and the routine use of mist nets for recording species have been detrimental to improving the knowledge on Paraná's bat diversity (Varzinczak et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 117 species have been registered to the Atlantic Forest bioma (Varzinczak et al 2015), 42.7% of them being recorded in Santa Catarina, turning the state into a hot spot for bat diversity in Brazil. Bats in Santa Catarina belong mainly to Phyllostomidae (19 spp.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miranda et al 2007, Cherem andAlthoff 2016), even though it is one of the priority regions for studies on the fauna of bats in the state of Santa Catarina. For the Atlantic Forest Domain, the fauna of bats can still be subsampled even in areas with a large sampling effort (Varzinczak et al 2015). Studies on the composition of the assemblages are still of fundamental importance.…”
Section: Gardner 2008b)mentioning
confidence: 99%