2010
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1007.4541
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the $J^P=2^-$ assignment for the $X(3872)$ compatible with the radiative transition data?

Abstract: The very recent analysis by BaBar Collaboration indicates that the X(3872) may favor the quantum number J P C = 2 −+ rather than the previously assumed 1 ++ . By pretending the η c2 (1D) charmonium to be the X(3872), we study the parity-even radiative transition processes η c2 (1D) → J/ψ(ψ ′ ) + γ within several phenomenological potential models. We take the 3 D 1 admixture in ψ ′ into account, and consider the contributions from the magnetic dipole (M 1), electric quadrupole (E2), and magnetic octupole (M 3) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However further reasons for the 1 D 2 interpretation to be problematic have started to show up. First, radiative decay transitions 1 D 2 → γJ/ψ(ψ ′ ) rates are shown to be incompatible with the data [21]. Second, the production cross section of the 1 D 2 level at CDF is predicted to be much smaller than the one actually observed for the X [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However further reasons for the 1 D 2 interpretation to be problematic have started to show up. First, radiative decay transitions 1 D 2 → γJ/ψ(ψ ′ ) rates are shown to be incompatible with the data [21]. Second, the production cross section of the 1 D 2 level at CDF is predicted to be much smaller than the one actually observed for the X [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In Ref. [21] both widths were calculated in a quite elaborated (though rather model-dependent) NRQCD approach, with the result:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Y. Jia et al [12] estimated the partial widths to be Γ(η c2 → γψ ′ ) ∼ 0.4 keV and Γ(η c2 → γJ/ψ) ∼ 9 keV. This favors the Belle measurement where the ratio Γ(η c2 →γψ ′ ) Γ(η c2 →γJ/ψ) is smaller.…”
Section: Charmonium Possibilities Of X (3872)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we will focus on the study of the properties of η c2 , such as its mass and radiative transition width to J/ψ. There are actually several phenomenological studies on this topic [26][27][28], but they are rather model dependent. In contrast, the lattice QCD approach, as a method from first principles, can provide information that is more model independent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%