2008
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799x-3-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is tension band wiring technique the "gold standard" for the treatment of olecranon fractures? A long term functional outcome study

Abstract: BackgroundTension band wiring (TBW) remains the most common operative technique for the internal fixation of olecranon fractures despite the potential occurrence of subjective complaints due to subcutaneous position of the hardware. Aim of this long term retrospective study was to evaluate the elbow function and the patient-rated outcome after TBW fixation of olecranon fractures.MethodsWe reviewed 62 patients (33 men and 29 women) with an average age of 48.6 years (range, 18–85 years) who underwent TBW osteosy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
146
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
146
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with those stated by Chalidiset al 13 and Lindenhoviuset al 14 and somewhat superior to that of Van der Linden et al 15 in terms of range of motion. Moreover flexion contracture or extension loss was found to somewhat similar as compared to most of the other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are consistent with those stated by Chalidiset al 13 and Lindenhoviuset al 14 and somewhat superior to that of Van der Linden et al 15 in terms of range of motion. Moreover flexion contracture or extension loss was found to somewhat similar as compared to most of the other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Chalidis et al 13 In our study we achieved similar results with respect to mean flexion, mean arc of motion and mean supination pronation arc compared to earlier studies. Our findings are consistent with those stated by Chalidiset al 13 and Lindenhoviuset al 14 and somewhat superior to that of Van der Linden et al 15 in terms of range of motion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, a proximal ''home run'' screw is positioned through the coronoid process, instead of the longer intramedullary screw that is used in our technique. In the study by Anderson et al, 92% of the patients had a good or excellent result, but among the patients with a comminuted olecranon fracture the mean DASH score (26) and mean MEPI score (88) were slightly less favorable than the scores in our patients. Anderson et al reported one case of construct failure and a much lower rate of plate removal (9.3%) as compared with that in our series (56%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…A possible explanation is that the locking compression plate does not contour closely to the bone, although it has been our experience that patients are inconvenienced by the implant regardless of how well it is contoured to the bone. Long-term follow-up studies on tension band fixation for the treatment of olecranon fractures have shown rates of hardware removal of >80% [26][27][28] . Furthermore, at some institutions, hardware removal has even been considered as routine practice 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In Byron E Chalidis et al, reviewed 62 patients of isolated olecranon fractures and came to a conclusion that tension band wiring technique is the "Gold standard" for the treatment of olecranon fractures and leads to good elbow function and minimal loss of physicalcapacity. 18 Tension band wiring with K-wire is the most common method for fixation of olecranon fractures and it works on the principle of converting tensile forces to compressive forces at fracture site, it usually gives good result but cancellous screws with tension band wiring combination provides the strength of fixation that is by converting the tensile force to a compressive force at the fracture site with additional resistance to the displacement due to the lag screw compression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%