2005
DOI: 10.1080/09658210344000305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is spoken duration a sufficient explanation of the word length effect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion is consistent with a number of studies that have shown less robust effects of language on backward than forward digit span (C. Chen & Stevenson, 1988;Hoosain, 1984). Also consistent are studies demonstrating a link between longer syllables and better recall performance on tasks requiring mental manipulations (Tolan & Tehan, 2005), similar to reciting numbers backwards.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This notion is consistent with a number of studies that have shown less robust effects of language on backward than forward digit span (C. Chen & Stevenson, 1988;Hoosain, 1984). Also consistent are studies demonstrating a link between longer syllables and better recall performance on tasks requiring mental manipulations (Tolan & Tehan, 2005), similar to reciting numbers backwards.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We tentatively suggest that these results are evidence that stored phonological representations and phonological retrieval cues are not used in syntactically based comprehension. The WLE has been interpreted as a reflection of rehearsal (Baddeley et al, 1975; for discussion, see Caplan et al, 1992; Service, 1998; Tolan and Tehan, 2005; Zhang and Feng, 1990; Lovatt et al, 2000), and we tentatively suggest that these results are evidence that rehearsal is not widely used in syntactically based comprehension. The WLE also results from lexical neighborhood density effects (Jalbert et al, 2011), which leads us to suggest that lexical items are retrieved in syntactically based comprehension without activating their entire network of associations (Vitevitch et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…4). Caplan, Rochon, and Waters (1992), Service (1998), Toland and Tehan (2005), Zhang and Feng (1990) and Lovatt, Avons, and Masterson (2000) did not replicate this result in English, Finnish, and Chinese. Neath, Bireta, and Surprenant (2003) found that, of four sets of words that differed in length and were equated for number of syllables and phonemes, only those from Baddeley et al (1975) showed the WLE (for discussion see Jalbert, Neath, Bireta, & Surprenant, 2011; Jalbert, Neath, & Surprenant, 2011).…”
Section: The Wm Model: Normative Datamentioning
confidence: 89%