Is Southern Xinjiang Really Unsafe?

Abstract

Destination image and safety not only affect tourist decision-making but also the sustainable development of tourist destinations. Some tourist destinations are too vulnerable to defend against emergency tourist crises, and tourists’ perceived safety can be severely biased, which is then deepened by media panic caused by the publication of excessive negative reports. This paper discusses the mechanism of perceived safety and perceived image on tourist behavioral intention, as well as the inter-group difference. Our study is based on a survey in Southern Xinjiang in which the respondents were divided into four groups. Four structural equation models were established with “perceived safety” and “perceived image” as independent variables, “destination trust” and “perceived value” as mediating variables, and “behavioral intention” as the dependent variable. The final results show that a paradox of safety perception exists in tourists’ perception of Southern Xinjiang. The perceived safety differs sharply between the tourists who have traveled to Southern Xinjiang and those who have not. The mechanism of perceived safety on tourist behavioral intention differs from that of the perceived image on tourist behavioral intention. Destination image still plays a key role in tourist traveling decision-making. The findings are of great significance for the restoration of cognitive bias, management, and marketing activities, and the sustainable development in Southern Xinjiang and similar destinations.

Examining the Antecedents of Brand Engagement of Tourists Based on the Theory of Value Co-Creation

“…The results showed that there was no deviation and the data were normally distributed. Additionally, we used Harman's single factor test, the multitrait-multimethod model, the partial correlation method, and other methods to test the bias of the data [121]. The results showed that there was no common method bias in this study; thus, it was suitable for further analysis.…”

“…Finally, 665 valid questionnaires were obtained after eliminating the invalid questionnaires, with a recovery rate of 78.20% and an effective rate of 85.04%. The number of collected questionnaires was much greater than 10 times the number of indicators; thus, the minimum requirements for establishing an effective structural equation model were met [120][121][122]. Therefore, the number of samples obtained could well meet the needs of the study.…”

How Can a Firm Innovate When Embedded in a Cluster?—Evidence from the Automobile Industrial Cluster in China

“…The normality of the data was analyzed via the kurtosis and skewness tests, which showed that the data were distributed normally. We tested several methods including the partial correlation method, the multi-trait-multimethod model, and Harman's single factor test to avoid the impact of common method bias [69,70]. The results indicated that there was no common method bias in the model.…”

How Does Value Co-Creation Behavior Affect Destination Loyalty? A Role Switching Perspective

“…The measurement dimensions of perceived value are not uniform due to the differences in the attributes and performances of tourist destinations, tourists' desires and expectations [33]. Prebensen (2017) developed a six-dimensional scale including quality value, economic value, novelty value, knowledge value, emotional value, and social value [34], which is widely used in tourism researches [3,11,35]. Quality value refers to tourists' perception of the quality of products or services [36,37]; economic value refers to tourists' perception of the value of the return [38]; novelty value is the value characteristics that tourists obtain from a product or service that are surprising and fresh [39]; knowledge value means that a tourist can learn from a product or the service, satisfying their thirst for knowledge [36]; emotional value is the emotional utility that tourists derive from a product or service, such as the pleasure and emotional satisfaction of a travel experience [36,40]; and social value is the equivalent utility of a traveler's social identity from a product or service and the enhancement of the traveler's self-image [41].…”