2021
DOI: 10.1111/jfir.12231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is social capital a determinant of board gender diversity?

Abstract: We examine the impact of social capital on board gender diversity among U.S. firms. We test whether trust and social networks in a county lead to an increase in female board representation. We find that firms headquartered in high‐social‐capital counties have higher diversity in their corporate board. Economically, we estimate that a 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in social capital leads to a 0.042 SD increase in board gender diversity. We contribute to the literature by extending the evidence on board gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firms located in high social capital regions tend to achieve a critical mass (i.e., three or more) of female directors; female directors hold memberships on audit, compensation, and/or nomination committees; and serve as chairs of audit and nomination committees. Oyotode‐Adebile and Ujah (2021) provide similar finding. Regarding executive compensation, Hoi et al (2019) document a negative relationship between social capital and CEO pay including opportunistic option grant awards, supporting the notion that high social capital mitigates managerial rent extraction in CEO compensation.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Social Capital And Social Trustsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Firms located in high social capital regions tend to achieve a critical mass (i.e., three or more) of female directors; female directors hold memberships on audit, compensation, and/or nomination committees; and serve as chairs of audit and nomination committees. Oyotode‐Adebile and Ujah (2021) provide similar finding. Regarding executive compensation, Hoi et al (2019) document a negative relationship between social capital and CEO pay including opportunistic option grant awards, supporting the notion that high social capital mitigates managerial rent extraction in CEO compensation.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Social Capital And Social Trustsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Lastly, this study also contributes to the literature related to the determinants of board gender diversity that remained focused on board characteristics, performance, ownership structure as antecedents of gender diversity in executive positions (Blommaert & van den Brink, 2020;Brieger et al, 2019;Oyotode-Adebile & Ujah, 2021;Saeed et al, 2016). We add to this cohort of studies by considering poor institutional quality at home as a driver of pursuing gender diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Section 4 discusses various board gender diversity laws in different countries. Additionally, researchers find that firms headquartered in US counties with high social capital (defined as beliefs, norms, and informal networks) tend to have more women on boards since social norms and networks put external pressure on firms and shareholders to pursue board gender diversity (Oyotode‐Adebile & Ujah, 2021). Firms headquartered in US states with more women‐friendly policies (availability of emergency contraception, public funding for abortion policies, and anti‐gender discrimination policies) tend to have more gender‐diverse boards (Thams et al, 2018).…”
Section: Situation‐centered Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%