Consequences of local social norms: A review of the literature in accounting, finance, and corporate governance

Abstract

We synthesise the empirical archival research on the consequences of local social norms on accounting, finance, and corporate governance outcomes in an international setting. The literature reviewed is premised on the theory that corporations do not make decisions, but managers do, and managers are likely to be influenced by the socioeconomic environment of the region in which they operate and/or by the people with whom they interact. To provide a structure to our review, we identify social capital, religiosity, gambling norms, and corruption culture, as four constructs of local social norms and link these with financial reporting and external auditing, financial, investment, and dividend decisions, capital market consequences and finally, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility behaviour of firms. We highlight some limitations of the existing research and offer some suggestions for future research.

The Power of Social Norms: Exploring the Influence of Cultural Factors on Economic Decision-Making

“…Local social norms relate to issues such as financial reporting, auditing, financial policy, investment, innovation and corporate social responsibility activities [25].…”

Non-linear relationship between control ownership and cumulative abnormal return: A new predictive tool for firms’ performance

“…According to Fama's perspective, the separation of ownership and control allows the performance of individuals and organizations to be monitored more effectively by creating competition between companies. In this sense, the authors argue that changing the management of institutions from owners interested primarily in increasing wealth to managers who understand the overall performance of the institution (Habib, D'Costa, & Al-Hadi, 2023) will increase the efficiency of the institutions. Fama and Jensen (1983) focused their attention on the costs that a high proportion of management ownership might have for a company.…”

Climate Change Denial and Corporate Environmental Responsibility

“…Recent studies demonstrate that the community is a salient stakeholder with powerful influence over corporate decisions and outcomes (for a review, see Habib et al, 2023). Community-level civic norms and social capital, for instance, mitigate agency problems related to managerial opportunism and compensation (Gupta & Minnick, 2022;Hoi et al, 2019) and positively influence managers' use of resources (Gao et al, 2021).…”