Is Smart Growth Associated with Reductions in Carbon Dioxide Emissions?

Abstract

The transportation sector is the second largest contributor to human-generated carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. A key goal of the U.S. Department of Transportation is to implement environmentally sustainable policies that can reduce carbon emissions from transportation sources. Smart growth—characterized by compact, mixed use; greater network connectivity; and environments friendly to alternative modes—may encourage reductions in vehicle travel and emissions. A better understanding of travel behavior in conventional and smart growth communities is needed to inform policies. A behavioral data set is analyzed to determine whether smart growth developments are associated with lower CO2 emissions. Sample selection models are estimated from a 2009 travel behavior survey of 15,213 households to capture the conditionality of emissions on the decision to drive (or not) by household members on a given day. Results indicated that 12% of responding households used alternative modes or did not travel from home; the rest of the sample traveled in an automobile and therefore contributed to CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions were calculated from vehicle miles traveled and the fuel efficiency of the vehicle used for specific trips taken by household members. The developed framework models whether CO2 emissions are associated with land use, sociodemographics, and preferences for adopting information technology. Tailpipe CO2 emissions are lower for households that reside in mixed land use neighborhoods with good network connections (on the order of 9%). As a long-term strategy, CO2 emissions reductions from smart growth developments can be substantial.

Estimating the non-linear effects of urban built environment at residence and workplace on carbon dioxide emissions from commuting

“…As a diversity indicator, land use entropy index at residence is negatively correlated with CEC in Figure 6A . This negative relationship is consistent with the previous literature ( 49 , 50 ). However, the land-use diversity at the workplace also has a non-linear effect on CEC, and 0.…”

Marginal Effects and Spatial Variations of the Impact of the Built Environment on Taxis’ Pollutant Emissions in Chengdu, China

“…Therefore, we believe that the aim of reducing taxis’ pollutant emissions cannot be achieved by simply pursuing an increase in land-use mixture. This negative relationship is consistent with many studies, such as from Wang [ 56 ]. However, the threshold of HHI in our study is different from the threshold (from 0.4 to 0.7) of HHI in the study by Wu et al [ 19 ].…”

Exploring the Spatial Heterogeneity and Influence Factors of Daily Travel Carbon Emissions in Metropolitan Areas: From the Perspective of the 15-min City

“…Regarding travel behavior, most of the literature examines the impact of "5D" built environment elements (density, diversity, design, destination accessibility, and transit proximity) [35,36]. According to the literature, built environment factors, such as residential and job density [37,38], land use mix [39], intersection density [39], and public transportation accessibility [38], are all negatively correlated with energy consumption and carbon emissions. Research from Zahabi et al [40] in Montreal, Canada, showed that a 10% increase in residential density, land-use mix, and transport accessibility leads to 3.5%, 2.5%, and 5.8% reductions in GHG emissions from household transport, respectively.…”