2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
132
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
132
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of environmental benefits, Ref. [17] provides a quantitative estimate of the reduction in emissions obtained by slow steaming. The author finds that reducing a vessel's speed by 10%, emissions decrease by at least 10-15%.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of environmental benefits, Ref. [17] provides a quantitative estimate of the reduction in emissions obtained by slow steaming. The author finds that reducing a vessel's speed by 10%, emissions decrease by at least 10-15%.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use this baseline as the medium fuel price scenario. $400/MT, which characterizes a relatively low price from the past five years (Bunkerworld, 2012), is used as the low price scenario to reflect an identified key slow steaming breakeven point (Barnard, 2010b;Cariou, 2011). Without reasonable knowledge of future oil prices, a $1000/MT high benchmark is set based on the equivalent distance from the medium scenario ($700/MT) to the lower ($400/MT) bound.…”
Section: Rq2 -Volume and Fuel Price Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pierre Cariou's paper, Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO 2 emissions from container shipping? shows that "Reducing a vessel's speed by 10% decreases emissions by at least 10-15%" proving that "one positive effect of slow steaming is that it lowers CO 2 emissions that are proportional to the amount of fuel burned" (Cariou, 2011). In another study done by Ching-Chin Chang and Chia-Hong Chang, they used an activity-based method to evaluate fuel consumption against CO 2 emissions and found that "speed reductions of 10%, 20%, and 30% reduced fuel consumption by 27.1%, 48.8%, and 60.3% and CO 2 emissions by 19%, 36%, and 51%, respectively" (Chang & Chang, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%