2014
DOI: 10.1130/g35045.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is river avulsion style controlled by floodplain morphodynamics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Having two water level boundary conditions as the driving force, as opposed to an upstream discharge boundary condition, is critical as it results in a floodplain-dependent discharge and sediment supply that enables levee breaches to close or to expand into an avulsion. Other morphodynamic models of crevasse splays (e.g., Hajek & Edmonds, 2014;Millard et al, 2017;Sandén et al, 2016) simulate autogenic breach discharge by including the trunk channel itself into the model domain. However, simulating the trunk channel is computationally expensive and numerically challenging, so here we simplify the channel boundary in order to focus deliberately on the role of floodplain conditions.…”
Section: à4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Having two water level boundary conditions as the driving force, as opposed to an upstream discharge boundary condition, is critical as it results in a floodplain-dependent discharge and sediment supply that enables levee breaches to close or to expand into an avulsion. Other morphodynamic models of crevasse splays (e.g., Hajek & Edmonds, 2014;Millard et al, 2017;Sandén et al, 2016) simulate autogenic breach discharge by including the trunk channel itself into the model domain. However, simulating the trunk channel is computationally expensive and numerically challenging, so here we simplify the channel boundary in order to focus deliberately on the role of floodplain conditions.…”
Section: à4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their model, as well as other "bifurcation stability" models (e.g., Bolla Pittaluga et al, 2003;Kleinhans et al, 2008), are commonly able to distinguish between unstable and stable breaches or bifurcations but do not take into account any distal floodplain effects on their stability, such as whether or not the floodplain is properly drained (e.g., Hajek & Edmonds, 2014;Mohrig et al, 2000). Channel bifurcation models also cannot predict crevasse splay morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, river avulsions take place when the main channel becomes infilled with sediments, triggering the diversion of the river into a new course (Slingerland and Smith, 2004;Buehler et al, 2011). River avulsions are the main mechanism behind the formation of distributary fluvial systems (DFS), which fill alluvial basins (Hajek and Edmonds, 2014;Weissmann et al, 2010;Hartley et al, 2010). High aggradation rates in the main river channel can result from a variety of causes such as (i) an increase in the sedimentary load of the river; (ii) an increase in the peak water discharge of the river or (iii) a decrease in the channel gradient, which can be caused by a rise of the base level or downstream tectonic uplift (Slingerland and Smith, 2004).…”
Section: Rivers and Palaeoriversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a large body of studies, the exact mechanisms controlling crevasse splays and river avulsions are not entirely understood (Hajek and Edmonds, 2014;Stouthamer and Berendsen, 2007; Ash- , 2004). When the various processes that push the river towards the avulsion threshold proceed at a faster pace than those that act as triggers, the latter control the frequency of crevasses and, eventually, avulsions (Jones and Schumm, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%