2010
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia

Abstract: In this letter we analyse the temporal development of physical population-driven water scarcity, i.e. water shortage, over the period 0 AD to 2005 AD. This was done using population data derived from the HYDE dataset, and water resource availability based on the WaterGAP model results for the period 1961-90. Changes in historical water resources availability were simulated with the STREAM model, forced by climate output data of the ECBilt-CLIO-VECODE climate model. The water crowding index, i.e. Falkenmark wat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
223
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
223
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Current hydrological literature often focuses on Bwater scarcity^(the bottom line for human populations rather than drought), in particular per capita water availability (Arnell 2004;Arnell et al 2011;Gosling and Arnell 2013;Kummu et al 2010) or a withdrawals-to-availability ratio (Gosling and Arnell 2013;Hanasaki et al 2013;Vörösmarty et al 2000). The impact of such scarcity on particular populations is then evaluated in terms of the numbers of people falling below a threshold value of water availability (e.g., 1000 m 3 /capita/year) or that exceed a certain withdrawals-to-availability ratio (exceeding 0.4 is seen as water stress or severe water limitation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current hydrological literature often focuses on Bwater scarcity^(the bottom line for human populations rather than drought), in particular per capita water availability (Arnell 2004;Arnell et al 2011;Gosling and Arnell 2013;Kummu et al 2010) or a withdrawals-to-availability ratio (Gosling and Arnell 2013;Hanasaki et al 2013;Vörösmarty et al 2000). The impact of such scarcity on particular populations is then evaluated in terms of the numbers of people falling below a threshold value of water availability (e.g., 1000 m 3 /capita/year) or that exceed a certain withdrawals-to-availability ratio (exceeding 0.4 is seen as water stress or severe water limitation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kummu et al (2010) avaliaram a escassez de água entre os anos 0 e 2005 d.C. em 284 bacias hidrográficas. Tomando como base o indicador de Falkenmark (Falkenmark;Lundqvist;Widstrand, 1989), os autores constataram que em 1800 a escassez era um problema que pouco afetava as populações ao redor da Terra.…”
Section: Revisão Da Literaturaunclassified
“…Essa bacia tem na agroindústria uma atividade importante, necessitando de água para a irrigação de culturas, processamento de alimentos e abastecimento urbano. Essa é uma situação que vem afetando diferentes países, conforme indicado pela pesquisa de Kummu et al (2010), o que é corroborado pelo trabalho de Wada et al (2013) ao avaliar que nos últimos cinquenta anos, a demanda de água mais do que dobrou, especialmente pelo incremento do consumo humano.…”
Section: Revisão Da Literaturaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the computation of operational drought indicators, the available water is often represented by the streamflow, or a fraction of it, and the water need is usually quantified by a standard per capita or by a fixed nominal demand (Falkenmark et al, 1989;Raskin et al, 1997). Depending on the application scope, operational drought indicators are either river-basin-specific (Garrote et al, 2007;Haro-Monteagudo et al, 2017) or used in studies covering continental or global areas with an annual time resolution (Yang et al, 2003;Oki and Kanae, 2006;Alcamo et al, 2007;Kummu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%