2019
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2348-18.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is PASA Passé?: Rethinking Compensatory Mechanisms in Cognitive Aging

Abstract: Review of Morcom and Henson A ubiquitous observation among cognitive aging studies across species is the substantial increase in interindividual variability of cognitive capacities, most notably in episodic memory and working memory, with age (Rapp, 2009; Morrison and Baxter, 2012). Anecdotal accounts of aging similarly characterize older adults as either remaining "sharp as a tack" or displaying debilitating memory loss even in the absence of neurodegenerative disease. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This age‐related pattern has been observed in explicit, but not implicit, negative emotion processing (Zsoldos et al., 2016). Whether this increase in prefrontal activity indicates a compensatory mechanism, neuroadaptation, or loss of neural specificity has been a subject of inquiry (Lloyd et al., 2021; Morcom & Henson, 2018; Myrum, 2019). In our study, there was a trend toward higher inferior frontal gyrus activity being related to higher accuracy in the emotional Stroop task for older adults (Supporting Information, Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This age‐related pattern has been observed in explicit, but not implicit, negative emotion processing (Zsoldos et al., 2016). Whether this increase in prefrontal activity indicates a compensatory mechanism, neuroadaptation, or loss of neural specificity has been a subject of inquiry (Lloyd et al., 2021; Morcom & Henson, 2018; Myrum, 2019). In our study, there was a trend toward higher inferior frontal gyrus activity being related to higher accuracy in the emotional Stroop task for older adults (Supporting Information, Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes were initially thought to be compensatory, given that cognitive function was comparable to younger adults despite these differences (Berlingeri et al, 2013;Reuter-Lorenz & Cappell, 2008). However, recent studies contradict this traditional view and posit that changes may actually be maladaptive, reflecting loss of efficiency and specialization of cognitive processes (Morcom & Henson, 2018;Myrum, 2019). In the longer term, this may be counter-productive, where prolonged exposure to an excitatory environment can result in neuronal damage and loss (Merlo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from a functional connectivity study also supported this view [8]. The widely accepted view of the functional role of the PASA effect today is active compensation [9]. There is empirical evidence that the posterior to anterior shift was associated with increased cognitive demands [10] and the PASA effect benefitted older adults in episodic encoding [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although the current consensus of the field gravitates toward the compensation view when interpreting the functional role of the PASA model [9], the alternative view is that the age-related increase in brain activation is due to a loss of functional specificities. This concept is called de-differentiation, which is conceptually the reversal process of functional differentiation that occurs during the developmental period [40].…”
Section: Compensation Vs Dedifferentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%