2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/vtc2020-spring48590.2020.9128822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Packet Dropping a Suitable Congestion Control Mechanism for Vehicular Networks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it depends on the previously mentioned message sizes and frequencies, it is a much more direct measure of the “costs” of the collective perception service. The CBR has been employed by several groups to compare CPM dissemination rules in terms of channel utilization [ 10 , 11 , 14 , 32 , 34 , 36 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As it depends on the previously mentioned message sizes and frequencies, it is a much more direct measure of the “costs” of the collective perception service. The CBR has been employed by several groups to compare CPM dissemination rules in terms of channel utilization [ 10 , 11 , 14 , 32 , 34 , 36 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better the PDR is for a certain set of dissemination rules, the lower the negative impact on the communication channel. This metric and its reciprocal, the packet error rate, have been used among others in [ 12 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to conventional congestion control protocols, V2X message compression can reduce the channel load without modifying the communication parameters (and hence the range) or the message rate. This has a positive effect on the execution of applications compared to current congestion control protocols that are based on packet dropping [7]. The obtained results have shown that V2X messages (CAM, CPM and MCM) can be compressed up to around 40-50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…the message rate [1] [2], the transmission power [3] [4], or the data rate [5] [6] to control the load. These solutions reduce the channel load at the expense of modifying the amount of information exchanged, the communication range or the protection against transmission errors [7]. These changes can negatively affect the execution of applications [8] and alternative approaches should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] authors compared the performance of two enablers based on IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V Release 14 by investigating both the MAC and physical layers. The aim in [10] was about discussing packet drop condition for congestion minimization. The effect of numerology modification related to C-V2X (Cellular Vehicle to Everything) communication was discussed in [11].…”
Section: Iiintroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%