2011
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.5.566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Oral Temperature an Accurate Measurement of Deep Body Temperature? A Systematic Review

Abstract: Evidence suggests that, regardless of whether the assessment is recorded at rest or during periods of changing core temperature, oral temperature is an unsuitable diagnostic tool for determining body temperature because many measures demonstrated differences greater than the predetermined validity threshold of 0.27°C (0.5°F). In addition, the differences were greatest at the highest rectal temperatures. Oral temperature cannot accurately reflect core body temperature, probably because it is influenced by facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the validity and reliability of T oral are very questionable compared to rectal (Casa et al 2007;Mazerolle et al 2011;Huggins et al 2012), it is still widely used in studies of biological rhythms (Waterhouse et al 2005;Hamouda et al 2012;Chtourou et al 2013). T oral in our study was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the evening (18:00 h) compared to the morning (08:00 h), with a gain of temperature at rest of 0.6°C.…”
Section: Oral Temperaturementioning
confidence: 43%
“…Even though the validity and reliability of T oral are very questionable compared to rectal (Casa et al 2007;Mazerolle et al 2011;Huggins et al 2012), it is still widely used in studies of biological rhythms (Waterhouse et al 2005;Hamouda et al 2012;Chtourou et al 2013). T oral in our study was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the evening (18:00 h) compared to the morning (08:00 h), with a gain of temperature at rest of 0.6°C.…”
Section: Oral Temperaturementioning
confidence: 43%
“…No cases of skin burns were observed, and only eight out of 208 stimulated sweating sessions (3.8%) led to a body temperature >38.0°C, all in the same patient who did not follow the instruction to lower the temperature of bathing water when a body temperature >38°C was measured the first time, because he had no side effects. Of note, the body core temperature might have been slightly underestimated because of the oral technique of temperature measurement . Another possible risk is brisk blood pressure lowering because of heat‐induced vasodilatation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of note, the body core temperature might have been slightly underestimated because of the oral technique of temperature measurement. 21 Another possible risk is brisk blood pressure lowering because of heat-induced vasodilatation. For this reason, participants with a history of cardio and/or cerebrovascular disease were excluded and antihypertensive drugs taken in the morning, at distance of the baths/Hammam visits.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, rectal temperature readings may underestimate hepatic temperature and the potential for hepatocellular heat-related damage, as metabolic activity in the liver contributes substantially to heat production (Jardine, 2007). Oral temperature, although easier to access, does not accurately reflect core temperature due to such factors as probe placement, ingestion of hot or cold fluids, and exposure to ambient air (Mazerolle et al, 2011).…”
Section: Noninvasive Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%