2019
DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20190503-02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is OCT Angiography Useful in Neurodegenerative Diseases?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is thinner, the retinal volume is reduced, and the choroidal thickness is reduced in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD compared to cognitively normal (CN) controls [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. A newer and more sophisticated version of the OCT, the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), has shown significant changes to the superficial and deep capillary vascular plexus of the macula and changes to the foveal avascular zone in those with cognitive dysfunction and AD compared to CN controls [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. However, data obtained by OCT/OCTA, while promising, have shown conflicting results and can be confounded by the presence of co-existing eye disease and systemic diseases, such as diabetes, as well as variations in cell layer measurements by different automated platforms [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is thinner, the retinal volume is reduced, and the choroidal thickness is reduced in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD compared to cognitively normal (CN) controls [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. A newer and more sophisticated version of the OCT, the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), has shown significant changes to the superficial and deep capillary vascular plexus of the macula and changes to the foveal avascular zone in those with cognitive dysfunction and AD compared to CN controls [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. However, data obtained by OCT/OCTA, while promising, have shown conflicting results and can be confounded by the presence of co-existing eye disease and systemic diseases, such as diabetes, as well as variations in cell layer measurements by different automated platforms [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since OCT-A was introduced in 2015, the current data available about its applications stem from studies that contain small sample sizes and this limits the level of evidence and the validity of the findings. 123 There is still a significant learning curve in terms of interpretation and there is no unanimous protocol as to which parameters should be taken into account and this may lead to falsepositive or -negative results that affect the validity of the findings and yield contradictory results among different study groups. 117 Another important limitation is that many of these neurodegenerative disorders can affect the mental capacity of such patients and subsequently their cooperation when OCT-A images are obtained.…”
Section: Limitations In the Use Of Oct-amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, this may lead to poor quality images that can lead to inaccurate interpretation due to motion artifacts. 123 Since OCT-A demands high levels of patient cooperation and attentiveness, it may not be quite useful imaging tools in children due to their very short attention span. 117 Furthermore, the commercially available OCT-A devices are not able to provide a wide field of view of the vasculature of the peripheral retina and the views are very limited to the posterior pole.…”
Section: Limitations In the Use Of Oct-amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations