2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00032-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
94
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the offer of a test being perceived as a recommendation to have it, and a lack of time to present choices fully. 125 Although most informants in our study expressed the view that patients were given a choice as to whether to undergo screening, informed choice was perceived as difficult to implement for many reasons, including time constraints, language barriers and patient reliance on GP recommendation. However, the quality of decisions made by women in the three trial groups did not vary, suggesting that the decision quality was not lower if the test was offered by GPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These include the offer of a test being perceived as a recommendation to have it, and a lack of time to present choices fully. 125 Although most informants in our study expressed the view that patients were given a choice as to whether to undergo screening, informed choice was perceived as difficult to implement for many reasons, including time constraints, language barriers and patient reliance on GP recommendation. However, the quality of decisions made by women in the three trial groups did not vary, suggesting that the decision quality was not lower if the test was offered by GPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Studying it can provide insight into the practices underlying institutionally mandated and -supported informing in a variety of settings, including libraries and information centers. Such practices include the negotiation of conflicts among competing sources and knowledge systems (McKenzie & Oliphant, 2006), the translation of the ideals of governing documents (Spoel, 2007) into practice (Burkell & McKenzie, 2005), and the navigation of mandated client-centeredness (Salmon & Hall, 2003) and neutral informing (Williams, Alderson, & Farsides, 2002;Alcock, n.d.) when these may be neither possible nor desirable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that way this group belongs to an expert health advice discourse that exists in written form (Locher & Hoffmann, 2006) and in some offline medical situations, for example e.g. antenatal screening and testing (Williams, Alderson & Farsides, 2002). That is not to say that the content of advice is ambiguous or vague.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%