2010
DOI: 10.3310/hta14200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a cohort study and cluster randomised trial to inform a simulation model. The Screening for Haemoglobinopathies in First Trimester (SHIFT) trial

Abstract: How to obtain copies of this and other HTA programme reports An electronic version of this title, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable DVD is also available (see below).Printed copies of HTA journal series issues cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our despatch agents.Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For Europ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25] In total, 34 articles met the inclusion criteria; data were extracted for 33 articles as two studies reported the same data on informed choice. 26,27 The final inclusion of papers was confirmed by the authors JE and SAM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25] In total, 34 articles met the inclusion criteria; data were extracted for 33 articles as two studies reported the same data on informed choice. 26,27 The final inclusion of papers was confirmed by the authors JE and SAM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In total, 12,459 participants were allocated, 8571 through the in-practice recruitment method and 3888 through the fully automated recruitment method. The median age of participants was 45 (interquartile range [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] years, 33% were in the most deprived quintile of deprivation for England and 39% were of 'white' ethnicity, with no differences among trial arms.…”
Section: Main Trial Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they have failed to increase the uptake of colorectal cancer screening among first-time invitees 39 or antenatal screening. 40 In field settings, a substantial proportion of participants asked to do so may not record a plan. 41 Moreover, plan formation has been shown to be most effective for individuals who are already motivated to perform the behaviour, 42 for example those who accepted a previous round of colorectal cancer screening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the trial design and results are reported elsewhere. 2,3 The economic analysis in SHIFT sought to predict the costs and benefits associated with the three strategies, in populations similar to those observed in the trial. An incremental analysis was adopted, the increment being the difference in costs and benefits between trial arms, with 'midwife care' as the default comparator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main finding was that offering SCT screening in primary care was effective (that is, the proportion of women screened before 10 weeks' gestation) but still only a minority of women were screened before 10 weeks. 2,3 The trial was supplemented with a modelbased cost-effectiveness analysis that sought to estimate the additional costs associated with primary care screening, both sequential and parallel, and the benefits in terms of the number of additional women screened before 10 weeks' gestation. This paper reports the costeffectiveness component of the SHIFT trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%