2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is NGO aid not so different after all? Comparing the allocation of Swiss aid by private and official donors

Abstract: Abstract:Being closer to the poor, NGOs are widely believed to provide better targeted aid than state agencies. But empirical evidence is largely lacking. We contribute to closing this gap by drawing on an exceptionally detailed Swiss database that covers different forms of NGO aid and several official aid benchmarks. The differentiated Tobit estimations account for both altruistic and selfish aid motivations. It turns out that it depends on the source of NGO funding as well as the choice of the official bench… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also at the one percent level of significance, the positive coefficient on population signals that larger countries receive more NGO aid. Corruption and Fragile are not significant at conventional levels as in Nunnenkamp et al (2009), indicating that Swiss NGOs do not grant more aid to countries with difficult environments -even though the World Bank (1998) suggests that NGOs may have a comparative advantage to work there. Finally, NGOs grant more aid to recipient countries hit by (more serious) disasters, at the one percent level of significance.…”
Section: Overall Ngo Samplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also at the one percent level of significance, the positive coefficient on population signals that larger countries receive more NGO aid. Corruption and Fragile are not significant at conventional levels as in Nunnenkamp et al (2009), indicating that Swiss NGOs do not grant more aid to countries with difficult environments -even though the World Bank (1998) suggests that NGOs may have a comparative advantage to work there. Finally, NGOs grant more aid to recipient countries hit by (more serious) disasters, at the one percent level of significance.…”
Section: Overall Ngo Samplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Empirical evidence is scarce and inconclusive. American and Norwegian NGOs appear to have allocated aid in line with perceived comparative advantages, whereas German and Swiss NGOs did not (Koch et al, 2007; Nunnenkamp et al, 2009). This leads to our third hypothesis:…”
Section: Previous Findings and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koch, Dreher, Nunnenkamp & Thiele (2009) find that Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) a) allocate more foreign aid to countries in need 1 , b) do not prefer to work in difficult environments, c) act less autonomously than expected, d) choose locations in line with other NGOs and e) allocate more foreign aid to similiar countries. Furthermore, Dreher, Mölders & Nunnenkamp (2007) and Nunnenkamp, Weingarth & Weisser (2009) investigate the determinants of aid allocation by Swedish and Swiss NGOs, respectively and Dollar & Levin (2006) find that multilateral donors tend to act more in accordance with the motive of merit than bilateral donors. In contrast, Nunnenkamp & Öhler (2009) not only distinguish between private and official aid but also disaggregate aid figures for various official German aid channels in order to show that aid through different channels is not motivated for the same reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%