1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.51.331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Magnetic Flux Quantized in a Toroidal Ferromagnet?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radius of the holes pierced in the spherical shell, r = 1 p, m, is of the order of magnitude obtained recently in actual devices [24]. As a matter of fact, a smaller radius r = 0.01 pm can be considered compatible with the classical limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The radius of the holes pierced in the spherical shell, r = 1 p, m, is of the order of magnitude obtained recently in actual devices [24]. As a matter of fact, a smaller radius r = 0.01 pm can be considered compatible with the classical limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although the static ether has been rejected by special relativity [27], the above filling potentials are not static entity but propagate at the speed of light. Aharonov-Bohm effect clearly presents that the unobservable potentials without electromagnetic field can cause electron interference [16,28,29]. By the same token, the filling potentials in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They base their ideas on the work of Tonomura et al [247], who have demonstrated single electron interference, and have shown that sending a large number of electrons through the double slit in one shot produces exactly the same interference pattern as sending them through one by one. Ghose et al quote Rauch's remark [248] that these experiments show that a wave function "describes an individual particle of a certain ensemble" because "there is always only one particle at a time inside the interferometer, but nevertheless one needs many particles for an interference pattern".…”
Section: General Discussion Of Ensemble Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%