2016
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it still important to study if ambient air pollution triggers stillbirth?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review of the role of prenatal ambient air pollution concluded that exposure appeared to increase stillbirth risk, particularly after late pregnancy exposure to sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter ≤10 microns (PM 10 ), and ozone (O 3 ), although most meta-analysis results included the null [ 3 ]. The meta-analyses were limited by crude exposure assessments based on ambient monitors and a reliance on registry data with limited information on important confounders and effect modifiers [ 4 ]. One important but understudied potential modifier is maternal asthma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review of the role of prenatal ambient air pollution concluded that exposure appeared to increase stillbirth risk, particularly after late pregnancy exposure to sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter ≤10 microns (PM 10 ), and ozone (O 3 ), although most meta-analysis results included the null [ 3 ]. The meta-analyses were limited by crude exposure assessments based on ambient monitors and a reliance on registry data with limited information on important confounders and effect modifiers [ 4 ]. One important but understudied potential modifier is maternal asthma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 Previous epidemiological studies have largely used fixed site air pollution monitoring data to estimate maternal exposure to air pollution. 79 Nonetheless, exposure misclassification does exist when assigning gaseous pollutant concentrations at a zip code level, as this is not representative of individual exposures. 36 However, this measurement error may be offset by improved control for residual confounding since proxy exposure measures are less susceptible to biases by personal characteristics 80 and less prone to reverse causation.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strength of our study was the use of validated ensemble models with high spatiotemporal resolution to derive our air pollution exposure measurements. , Previous epidemiological studies have largely used fixed site air pollution monitoring data to estimate maternal exposure to air pollution . Nonetheless, exposure misclassification does exist when assigning gaseous pollutant concentrations at a zip code level, as this is not representative of individual exposures .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Für die anderen Luftschadstoffe wurde kein signifikanter Effekt beobachtet, eine erhöhte Suszeptibilität gegenüber CO und PM 2.5 wiesen Frauen mit Asthma auf. Wie Pedersen[108] darstellt, sind aufgrund der Bedeutung für die Gesamtbevölkerung zur Beurteilung des Effektes weitere, v. a. in Bezug auf Design und Abschätzung der Schadstoffbelastung besser vergleichbare Studien notwendig.…”
unclassified