2017
DOI: 10.5603/kp.2017.0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it possible to further improve clinical results with coronary bifurcation stenting, or what is more important — the technique or the stent?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, mainly Non-Compliant balloon catheters are used for the pre-dilatation of heavily calcified lesions, post-dilatation of implanted stent to enhance the parameters of expansion, dealing with coronary bifurcation lesion through kissing balloon technique and management of cases with restenosis, particularly in previously implanted stents. [13][14][15] According to several studies, use of Non-Compliant (NC) balloon for Post Dilatation (PD) is found to be associated with optimal expansion hence higher frequency of optimal stent deployment, lower rates of Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) and better clinical outcomes of the patients going through elective angioplasty. 16 This study focuses on the evaluation of impacts of PD performed with Non-Compliant balloon on angiographical outcome (that is TIMI flow grade) in patients who went through the primary PCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, mainly Non-Compliant balloon catheters are used for the pre-dilatation of heavily calcified lesions, post-dilatation of implanted stent to enhance the parameters of expansion, dealing with coronary bifurcation lesion through kissing balloon technique and management of cases with restenosis, particularly in previously implanted stents. [13][14][15] According to several studies, use of Non-Compliant (NC) balloon for Post Dilatation (PD) is found to be associated with optimal expansion hence higher frequency of optimal stent deployment, lower rates of Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) and better clinical outcomes of the patients going through elective angioplasty. 16 This study focuses on the evaluation of impacts of PD performed with Non-Compliant balloon on angiographical outcome (that is TIMI flow grade) in patients who went through the primary PCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, several registries have confirmed the feasibility of the Absorb implantation for so-called "off-label" indications [16,17], i.e. acute coronary syndromes [18][19][20], bifurcations [21], saphenous vein grafts [22], chronic total occlusions, etc. However, results of the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry suggest an elevated risk of definite or probable device thrombosis in patients treated with the Absorb in the "real-world" setting (1.5% at 30 days and 2.1% at six months) [23].…”
Section: Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 97%