Is it hard to be different during the COVID-19 crisis? Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to contribute to the literature on the earnings management (EM)–corporate social responsibility (CSR) relationship as most of the previous studies have been carried out in non-turbulent periods. This study investigates whether CSR affects EM during the pandemic period by testing two hypotheses: the cognitive biases hypothesis and the resilience hypothesis Design/methodology/approach The difference-in-difference and triple difference approaches are used for a sample of 536 US firms (268 socially responsible firms and 268 matched non-socially responsible counterparts) during the 2017–2021 period. Socially responsible firms are selected from the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, and matched firms are identified through the propensity score matching method. Findings The authors find an income-increasing practice for both socially responsible firms and control firms for the whole period and each sub-period. Moreover, socially responsible firms are more likely to manage their earnings (income increasing) than their counterpart. Furthermore, the authors show that CSR commitment exacerbated EM in line with the cognitive biases hypothesis. Originality/value This study is the first shed light on the dark side of CSR during pandemic periods.

Does the sun ‘shine’ on utility firms? Evidence from pollution control bonds and overinvestment relationship

“…In contrast, during the health crisis, PCBs exhibited a negative effect on overinvestment; however, CEO overconfidence did not moderate this relationship. This can be attributed to panic-driven behaviors observed during the health crisis (Khanchel and Lassoued, 2022; Khanchel et al , 2023c, 2023d; Khanchel and Lassoued, 2023). Outside of these two crises, the results remained consistent with those of the primary analysis.…”

Are small waves fondle and big waves overturn? Market reaction and corporate governance during four COVID-19 waves

“…As the pandemic spreads (the second, third and fourth waves) and the economic consequences of the lockdowns are important, firms sought solutions to cope with the crisis (Khanchel et al, 2023b). During the subsequent waves following the first one, fear of COVID-19 did not affect the pursuit of goals in this turbulent period (Khanchel and Lassoued, 2022). Many arguments explain why firms were more concerned about adjusting corporate governance to cope with the crisis as the pandemic spreads.…”

“…By considering the specific feature of each wave, firms require to review, adjust and transform their corporate governance system. Thus, firms' behavior is not the same at the different stages of this crisis (Khanchel and Lassoued, 2022;Golubeva, 2021). However, the literature on this area remains highly underdeveloped.…”

“…Third , distress intolerance decreases as the pandemic spreads (Khanchel and Lassoued, 2022). When COVID-19 hit, a wide array of psychopathologies appeared (such as depressive symptoms and worry, major depression, generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder) because the crisis is unprecedented.…”

Sustainability and firm performance: the role of environmental, social and governance disclosure and green innovation

“…First , the US is the largest economy and the biggest stock market in the world. Second , more and more firms have integrated voluntary and individual sustainability tools into their activities, aware of the added value it could have in strategic terms and in terms of image and performance (Khanchel and Lassoued, 2022b). Third , S&P 500 includes the largest US companies listed on the NYSE and NASDAQ, making them more exposed to considerable stakeholder attention and more likely to combine sustainable investments.…”