Abstract:The NBA Three-Point Contest has been considered an ideal setting to study the hot hand, as it showcases the elite professional shooters that hot hand beliefs are typically directed towards, but in an environment that eliminates many of the confounds present in game action. We collect 29 years of NBA Three-Point Contest television broadcast data (1986-2015), apply a statistical approach that improves on those of previous studies, and find considerable evidence of hot hand shooting in and across individuals. Our… Show more
“…GVT's betting study on hot hand beliefs, which Gilovich has referred to as "...the most important bit of evidence against the hot hand," found that players are unable to successfully predict the shot outcomes of their teammates. 70 However, it has recently been shown that the statistical tests used in GVT's betting study are severely underpowered, and the effect sizes misinterpreted (Miller and Sanjurjo 2017). In fact, an improved re-analysis of their data yields strong evidence that players are skilled at predicting their teammates' shot outcomes (Miller and Sanjurjo 2017), which is consistent with the results on beliefs what we observe here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Nevertheless, we find a hot hand effect across all extant controlled shooting studies. This evidence is consistent with the pooled hot hand effects observed in relatively less controlled environments such as the ("semi-controlled") NBA three point contest (Miller and Sanjurjo 2015), 69 NBA free throw shooting (Arkes 2010;Yaari and Eisenmann 2011), and NBA live ball shooting (Bocskocsky et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…69 The NBA three point contest is less controlled than a shooting experiment yet also has some of the same important features. For an analysis of 29 years of shootout data using the empirical approach introduced here see Miller and Sanjurjo (2015).…”
The hot hand fallacy has long been considered a massive and widespread cognitive illusion with important implications in economics and finance. We develop a novel empirical strategy to correct for several fundamental limitations in the canonical study and replications, conduct an improved field experiment to test for the hot hand in its original domain (basketball shooting), and gather all extant controlled shooting data. We find strong evidence of hot hand shooting in every dataset, including on the individual level. Also, in a novel study of beliefs, we find that expert observers can predict (out-of-sample) which shooters are hotter.
“…GVT's betting study on hot hand beliefs, which Gilovich has referred to as "...the most important bit of evidence against the hot hand," found that players are unable to successfully predict the shot outcomes of their teammates. 70 However, it has recently been shown that the statistical tests used in GVT's betting study are severely underpowered, and the effect sizes misinterpreted (Miller and Sanjurjo 2017). In fact, an improved re-analysis of their data yields strong evidence that players are skilled at predicting their teammates' shot outcomes (Miller and Sanjurjo 2017), which is consistent with the results on beliefs what we observe here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Nevertheless, we find a hot hand effect across all extant controlled shooting studies. This evidence is consistent with the pooled hot hand effects observed in relatively less controlled environments such as the ("semi-controlled") NBA three point contest (Miller and Sanjurjo 2015), 69 NBA free throw shooting (Arkes 2010;Yaari and Eisenmann 2011), and NBA live ball shooting (Bocskocsky et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…69 The NBA three point contest is less controlled than a shooting experiment yet also has some of the same important features. For an analysis of 29 years of shootout data using the empirical approach introduced here see Miller and Sanjurjo (2015).…”
The hot hand fallacy has long been considered a massive and widespread cognitive illusion with important implications in economics and finance. We develop a novel empirical strategy to correct for several fundamental limitations in the canonical study and replications, conduct an improved field experiment to test for the hot hand in its original domain (basketball shooting), and gather all extant controlled shooting data. We find strong evidence of hot hand shooting in every dataset, including on the individual level. Also, in a novel study of beliefs, we find that expert observers can predict (out-of-sample) which shooters are hotter.
“…(3) as those for the NBA three-point contest (Miller & Sanjurjo, 2019) and NBA FT shooting (Arkes, 2010(Arkes, , 2013Lantis & Nesson, 2021;Mews & Ötting, 2021).…”
“…According to this idea, people assume equal frequency of outcomes within a random sequence that fits into short-term memory (STM), and such sequences have a tendency to alternate too often. A recent account argues that biases of randomness reflect people’s limited perceptual experiences with the environment (Hahn & Warren, 2009; Miller & Sanjurjo, 2015).…”
Binary information is prevalent in the environment and contains 2 distinct outcomes. Binary sequences consist of a mixture of alternation and repetition. Understanding how people perceive such sequences would contribute to a general theory of information processing. In this study, we examined how people process alternation and repetition in binary sequences. Across 4 paradigms involving estimation, working memory, change detection, and visual search, we found that the number of alternations is underestimated compared with repetitions (Experiment 1). Moreover, recall for binary sequences deteriorates as the sequence alternates more (Experiment 2). Changes in bits are also harder to detect as the sequence alternates more (Experiment 3). Finally, visual targets superimposed on bits of a binary sequence take longer to process as alternation increases (Experiment 4). Overall, our results indicate that compared with repetition, alternation in a binary sequence is less salient in the sense of requiring more attention for successful encoding. The current study thus reveals the cognitive constraints in the representation of alternation and provides a new explanation for the overalternation bias in randomness perception. (PsycINFO Database Record
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.