2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731109004133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is intensification of reproduction rhythm sustainable in an organic sheep production system? A 4-year interdisciplinary study

Abstract: A 4-year interdisciplinary study was performed to compare two organically managed sheep production systems, using 118 ewes and 24 ha each. The systems differed in the ewes' reproduction rhythm: one lambing per ewe per year (1L/1Y), with the aim of balancing feed self-sufficiency and lamb marketing periods v. three lambings over 2 years (3L/2Y), with the aim of maximising ewes' productivity. The sustainability was evaluated through ewes' reproductive performance, lamb growth rate, carcass characteristics and qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, Pardos & Fantova (2009), when analysing the economic profitability of sheep farms between years 2002-2007, reported a diminution in economic margins per ewe of about -32.9%, mainly triggered by increase in feeding costs. As observed in this study, under the current uncertainty in markets, characterised by a generalised increase and rapid fluctuation in prices of major inputs (concentrates, cereals and energy), the economic advantage is greater for feed self-sufficient farms (Benoit et al, 2009;Bernués et al, 2011). According to Ripoll-Bosch et al (2014), high feed self-sufficiency and low depen-dency on off-farm input (variable costs) in sheep-meat farming systems enhance the economic performance per labour unit and guarantees farm stability, which is particularly the case of the forage-based diet (PRE-HAY + POST-HAY).…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In this sense, Pardos & Fantova (2009), when analysing the economic profitability of sheep farms between years 2002-2007, reported a diminution in economic margins per ewe of about -32.9%, mainly triggered by increase in feeding costs. As observed in this study, under the current uncertainty in markets, characterised by a generalised increase and rapid fluctuation in prices of major inputs (concentrates, cereals and energy), the economic advantage is greater for feed self-sufficient farms (Benoit et al, 2009;Bernués et al, 2011). According to Ripoll-Bosch et al (2014), high feed self-sufficiency and low depen-dency on off-farm input (variable costs) in sheep-meat farming systems enhance the economic performance per labour unit and guarantees farm stability, which is particularly the case of the forage-based diet (PRE-HAY + POST-HAY).…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The main adaptation is for protein intake, using mixed cultivation of peas and cereals (36% of the total concentrate use) and cake from rapeseed (13% of total concentrates). Private farm monitoring under an experimental design at farm scale (Benoit et al, 2009) showed that there is no physiological problem with using a mixture of cereal and peas for ewes or lambs for end-fattening. Oil-seed cake can be used for dairy cow feeding within the limit of 5% of lipids in the total diet, with favourable impact on milk production (Brunschwig and Lamy, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic farming systems have shown how total substitution of synthetic nitrogen by legumes is not just a viable option but an increasingly feasible option in farms where animal production occupies a larger share of the activity, as it offers a means of organizing the rotation with temporary pasture based on legumes (Olesen et al, 1999;Benoit et al, 2009). There are alternative solutions that can be implemented to improve nitrogen balance, such as growing undersown legume crops to increase nitrogen fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Spain, many sheep farms have intensified the production system (Pardos et al, 2008) through the intensification of arable land (Stoate et al, 2001), reduction or abandonment of grazing, augmentation of indoor feeding (Oregui and Falagá n, 2006) and substitution of on-farm natural resources with external inputs (Riedel et al, 2007). Nevertheless, this process of intensification does not always yield better economic results or improve efficiency (Pé rez et al, 2007;Benoit et al, 2009). Certain studies suggest that many sheep farming systems are not economically profitable (De Rancourt et al, 2006;Dubeuf, 2011) and have an uncertain future with a high risk for further marginalisation (Bernué s et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%