2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is height a core geometric cue for navigation? Young children’s use of height in reorientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
17
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, children at this age could not use four identical objects, the 2-D form on the floor, or lines drawn on the floor to reorient, although these cues also provided the same rectangular configuration and horizontal distance cues as the bumps (Lee & Spelke, 2008. However, Hu et al (2015) found that children used the distance information from horizontal geometry at a younger age than the vertical distance information from wall height. In their study, 3-and 4-year-old children were tested in three different enclosures: a rectangular room with walls at the same height and a flat ceiling (where only geometric shape information was available), a square room with walls at different heights and a slanted ceiling (where only height cues were available), and a rectangular room with walls at different height and a slanted ceiling (where both geometric shape and height cues were available).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, children at this age could not use four identical objects, the 2-D form on the floor, or lines drawn on the floor to reorient, although these cues also provided the same rectangular configuration and horizontal distance cues as the bumps (Lee & Spelke, 2008. However, Hu et al (2015) found that children used the distance information from horizontal geometry at a younger age than the vertical distance information from wall height. In their study, 3-and 4-year-old children were tested in three different enclosures: a rectangular room with walls at the same height and a flat ceiling (where only geometric shape information was available), a square room with walls at different heights and a slanted ceiling (where only height cues were available), and a rectangular room with walls at different height and a slanted ceiling (where both geometric shape and height cues were available).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In their study, 3-and 4-year-old children were tested in three different enclosures: a rectangular room with walls at the same height and a flat ceiling (where only geometric shape information was available), a square room with walls at different heights and a slanted ceiling (where only height cues were available), and a rectangular room with walls at different height and a slanted ceiling (where both geometric shape and height cues were available). Hu et al (2015) found that both age groups could use geometric shape to find the hidden toy in the flat-ceiling rectangular room, but only 4-year-old children could use height to reorient in the two slanted-ceiling rooms. They suggested that the geometric shape of the environment takes priority over height cues during reorientation by children and that height may not be a component in the geometric module.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations