2003
DOI: 10.1080/00131910303252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Education Ready for the Inclusion of Pupils With Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties: A rights perspective?

Abstract: Inclusion, as a place in mainstream schools, is frequently advocated for pupils with special educational needs. For pupils with special educational needs that lie on the continuum of emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) this form of inclusion is often not an aspect of the provision they receive. This form of inclusion is based upon a rights argument mainly seen from one perspective, that of Human rights. This papers suggests that other rights, legal and civil, also have to be taken into account and tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an awareness from the literature review that many schools have embraced inclusion of students with disabilities and have provided appropriate programs within the mainstream schools (Clark, et al, 1999). There have been however, limitations to inclusion and even exclusion of students with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties (Visser & Stokes, 2003).…”
Section: Chapter 10 Reflections On Successful Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is an awareness from the literature review that many schools have embraced inclusion of students with disabilities and have provided appropriate programs within the mainstream schools (Clark, et al, 1999). There have been however, limitations to inclusion and even exclusion of students with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties (Visser & Stokes, 2003).…”
Section: Chapter 10 Reflections On Successful Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visser and Stokes (2003) contend that whilst inclusion is advocated for a wide range of students with special needs, provision does not extend for those with emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD). They argue that whilst other special needs students are included based on their human rights to mainstream education, with EBD students "other rights, legal and civil, also have to be taken into account and that these rights conflict".…”
Section: Limits To Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental disabilities include emotional and behavioral difficulties that range from social maladaptation to abnormal emotional stresses. They are persistent (if not necessarily permanent) and constitute learning difficulties (Visser & Stokes, 2003).…”
Section: Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational inclusion can be understood as a person's right to belong and participate in the educational system, with the assumption that this system is inclusive and hence there is no requirement for right of entry to be negotiated (Visser & Stokes, 2003). Despite the existence of policies towards inclusion in higher education, university as an institution has long been known as an entity that promotes segregation (Pitman, 2015;Torres & Schugurensky, 2002;Altbach, Reisberg & Rumbley, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to updating the terminology to represent that of current policy, the revised Teacher Attitudes to Inclusion Scale extends the original questionnaire to include an assessment of teachers' willingness to include different types of SEN within their classroom, as some research suggests that children with certain difficulties may be more problematic to include within the mainstream classroom compared to others (Evans & Lunt, 2002;Visser, Cole, & Daniels, 2003;Visser & Stokes, 2003). Questions relating to teachers' perceived adequacy of support have also been added to the TAIS based on findings to suggest that these may play an important role in teachers' attitudes toward inclusion (for example, Goodman & Burton, 2010).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%