Is early intervention in psychosis effective?

Abstract

SummaryAims – Psychosis is a traumatic experience for both sufferers and their families. The morbidity and mortality associated with psychosis may be improved by an assertive, specialised, multidisciplinary approach to care, provided at the earliest opportunity. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) uses such approach to improve the individual's short and long-term symptomatic and functional outcome, as well as quality of life. However, there is still controversy about whether this type of intervention is effective enough to justify its associated costs. Methods – We reviewed evidence from the literature on EIP for schizophrenia spectrum and non-affective psychoses, with particular attention to evidence on its effectiveness in reducing the duration of untreated symptoms, preventing relapses and reducing admission rates, reducing suicide rates, and reducing treatment costs. Results – There is preliminary evidence that EIP may be effective in delaying transition to psychosis, reducing DUP, preventing relapses, reducing admission and suicidal rates, and reducing treatment costs. Discussion – EIP remains a stimulating multidisciplinary approach to psychosis and a demanding commitment for mental health professionals and service developers.Declaration of Interest: None.

Polish individuals with an at‐risk mental state: demographic and clinical characteristics

“…[12][13][14][15][16] Early intervention has been shown to shorten the duration of untreated psychosis and improve outcomes. 13,[17][18][19] The first early intervention service in Central-Eastern Europe was established in Poland in 2009. This service runs the PORT programme intended for ARMS individuals; the word PORT refers to both the Polish translation of 'harbour' and the acronym of the Polish translation of 'Programme of Recognition and Therapy'.…”

Age at onset and latency to treatment (duration of untreated illness) in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: a naturalistic study

“…Over the last two decades, the duration of untreated illness (DUI), defined as the interval between the onset of a specific psychiatric disorder and the administration of the first pharmacological treatment has been increasingly investigated as potential predictor of clinical outcome and course across different psychiatric disorders and in the field of first-episode psychosis in particular (Altamura et al, 2001;Ricciardi et al, 2008). Different reasons encourage the investigation of causes (i.e.…”

What are the major drivers of prevalent disability burden in young Australians?

“…For anorexia nervosa, family‐based treatment can be effective in the context of comprehensive specialist treatment 14 . For schizophrenia, early intervention programs have the potential to reduce the associated disability, 15 , 16 but more evaluation of medium‐term outcomes and generalisability is needed 17 , 18 …”