“…For CT, humeral residual articular arc and percentage of articular arc loss, HSL width and depth, percentage of anterior glenoid defect, bare area, on-track and off-track, Franceschi grading, Calandra classification, Richards grading, Hall grading, Rowe grading, Flatow percentage, linear-based and area-based methods were used. 10,31,39,52 The reported sensitivity when confirmed by CT was between 20% and 65%, and the specificity was between 41.7% and 87%. 25,39 Accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were not reported amongst the CT studies.…”